Triangular Love Scale, Short Form (Sumter, Valkenburg, & Peter, 2013)

Types of love: passion, intimacy, and commitment in adolescents and adults; 12 Items, Ages 12-88 (broken down)
  • Populations: Adolescents, Adults
  • Age ranges: 12-88
  • Languages: Dutch, English
  • Countries: Netherlands

Items

Filter question (Sumter, Valkenburg, & Peter, 2013)
We recommend to include the following filter question. Please describe your current relationship status?
a. I am currently dating, married or in a stable relationship - Go to version 1
b. I currently don’t have a partner, but I have dated, been married or had a stable relationship - Go to version 2
c. I have never dated nor been in a stable relationship - Go to version 3

 

Version 1 - in romantic relationship
Adolescents are asked to think about the person they are currently dating or are in a relationship with. Adult are asked to think about their (marital) partner.

Passion

  • I feel a strong attraction to my partner.
  • I feel sexually aroused by my partner.
  • I find my partner sexually attractive.
  • My partner and I clearly show each other our love.

Intimacy

  • My partner and I always tell each other personal things.
  • I tell my partner everything.
  • My partner and I tell each other all our secrets.
  • My partner understands how I feel.

Commitment

  • I want my relationship to be neverending.
  • I never want to have another partner.
  • I want the relationship with my partner to last forever.
  • I am rather with my partner than with anyone else.

Version 2 - with romantic relationship experience, but currently not involved
Adolescents are asked to think about their former girlfriend or boyfriend. Adults are asked to think about their former (marriage) partner.

Passion

  • I felt strongly attracted to my partner.
  • I felt sexually aroused by my partner.
  • I found my partner sexually attractive.
  • My partner and I clearly showed each other our love.

Intimacy

  • My partner and I always told each other personal things.
  • I told my partner everything.
  • My partner and I told each other all our secrets.
  • My partner understood how I felt.

Commitment

  • I wanted my relationship to be neverending.
  • I never wanted to have another partner
  • I wanted the relationship with my partner to last forever.
  • I was rather with my partner than with anyone else.

Version 3 - with no romantic relationship experience
Adolescents are asked to think about a future girlfriend/boyfriend. Adults are asked to think about a future (marriage)partner.

Passion

  • I want to feel strongly attracted to my partner.
  • I want to feel sexually aroused by my partner.
  • I want to find my partner sexually attractive.
  • My partner and I will clearly show each other our love.

Intimacy

  • My partner and I always will tell each other personal things.
  • I will tell my partner everything.
  • My partner and I will tell each other all our secrets.
  • My partner will understand how I feel.

Commitment

  • I would want my relationship to be never-ending.
  • I would never want to have another partner. I would want the relationship with my partner to last forever.
  • I would rather be with my partner than with anyone else. 

 

Responses

Items used a 5 part ordinal response format: very true, true, partly true/partly untrue, untrue, very untrue

Scoring

Responses to the 12 items ranged from 1 (very untrue) to 5 (very true)

Citations

  • Sumter, S. R., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). Perceptions of love across the lifespan: Differences in passion, intimacy, and commitment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 37(5), 417-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025413492486
  • Overbeek, G., Ha, T., Scholte, R., de Kemp, R., & Engels, R. (2007). Brief report: Intimacy, passion, and commitment in romantic relationships – Validation of a ‘triangular love scale’ for adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 523–528.

Team comments

This measure is reported with multiple versions to be administered based on the romantic experience of participants.

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Unknown: Face validity
  • Unknown: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading