Test of Sexual Attitudes (Hudson, Murph, & Nurius, 1983)
- Populations: middle and late adolescents
- Age ranges: 16-18
- Languages: English, Spanish
- Countries: Spain; United States
Items
- I think there is too much sexual freedom given to adults these days
- I think that the increased sexual freedom seen in the past several years has done much to undermine the American family
- I think that young people have been given too much information about sex
- Sex education should be restricted to the home
- Older people do not need to have sex
- Sex education should be given only when people are ready for marriage
- Premarital sex may be a sign of a decaying social order
- Extramarital sex is never excusable
- I think there is too much sexual freedom given to teenagers these days
- I think there is not enough sexual restraint among young people
- I think people indulge in sex too much
- I think the only proper way to have sex is through intercourse
- I think sex should be reserved for marriage
- Sex should be only for the young
- Too much social approval has been given to homosexuals
- Sex should be devoted to the business of procreation
- People should not masturbate
- Heavy sexual petting should be discouraged
- People should not discuss their sexual affairs or business with others
- Severely handicapped (physically and mentally) people should not have sex
- There should be no laws prohibiting sexual acts between consenting adults
- What two consenting adults do together sexually is their own business
- There is too much sex on television
- Movies today are too sexually explicit
- Pornography should be totally banned from our bookstores
(Hudson, Murph, & Nurius, 1983)
Responses
Items used a 5 point Likert-type response scale:
- 1 Strongly disagree
- 2 Disagree
- 3 Neither agree nor disagree
- 4 Agree
- 5 Strongly agree
Scoring
“all but two items are worded and scored so that a higher score represents a more conservative orientation. Items 21 and 22 are worded and scored so that a higher score represents a more liberal attitude concerning sexual expression...
The total SAS score is then computed as S = (ΣX-7V)(100)/([N][4])
where X is an individual item score, and AT is the total number of items that are properly completed. Items that are left blank or scored outside the range from 1 to 5 are given a score of 0.” (Hudson, Murph, & Nurius, 1983)
Citations
- Walter W. Hudson, Gerald J. Murphy & Paula S. Nurius (1983) A short‐form scale to measure liberal vs. conservative orientations toward human sexual expression, Journal of Sex Research, 19:3, 258-272, DOI: 10.1080/00224498309551186
- Sáez Uribarri, Í., & Guijarro Santamaría, C. (2000). Actitudes y experiencia sexual en mujeres jóvenes = Attitudes and sexual experience in young women. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicologica, 9(1), 73–90. psyh.
Team comments
This scale was originally validated in an adult population by Hudson, Hudson, Murph, & Nurius. Therefore, age and validation data presented here are only taken from the work of Uribarri and Santamaría (2000).
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Unknown: Face validity
- Unknown: Convergent validity
- Unknown: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available