Test of Sexual Attitudes (Hudson, Murph, & Nurius, 1983)

Sexual attitudes in middle-late adolescent girls; 25 Items, Ages 16-18
  • Populations: middle and late adolescents
  • Age ranges: 16-18
  • Languages: English, Spanish
  • Countries: Spain; United States

Items

  • I think there is too much sexual freedom given to adults these days 
  • I think that the increased sexual freedom seen in the past several years has done much to undermine the American family 
  • I think that young people have been given too much information about sex 
  • Sex education should be restricted to the home 
  • Older people do not need to have sex 
  • Sex education should be given only when people are ready for marriage 
  • Premarital sex may be a sign of a decaying social order 
  • Extramarital sex is never excusable 
  • I think there is too much sexual freedom given to teenagers these days 
  • I think there is not enough sexual restraint among young people 
  • I think people indulge in sex too much 
  • I think the only proper way to have sex is through intercourse 
  • I think sex should be reserved for marriage 
  • Sex should be only for the young 
  • Too much social approval has been given to homosexuals 
  • Sex should be devoted to the business of procreation 
  • People should not masturbate 
  • Heavy sexual petting should be discouraged 
  • People should not discuss their sexual affairs or business with others 
  • Severely handicapped (physically and mentally) people should not have sex 
  • There should be no laws prohibiting sexual acts between consenting adults 
  • What two consenting adults do together sexually is their own business 
  • There is too much sex on television 
  • Movies today are too sexually explicit 
  • Pornography should be totally banned from our bookstores 

(Hudson, Murph, & Nurius, 1983)

 

Responses

Items used a 5 point Likert-type response scale:

  • 1 Strongly disagree
  • 2 Disagree
  • 3 Neither agree nor disagree
  • 4 Agree
  • 5 Strongly agree

Scoring

“all but two items are worded and scored so that a higher score represents a more conservative orientation. Items 21 and 22 are worded and scored so that a higher score represents a more liberal attitude concerning sexual expression... 

 The total SAS score is then computed as S = (ΣX-7V)(100)/([N][4])

where X is an individual item score, and AT is the total number of items that are properly completed. Items that are left blank or scored outside the range from 1 to 5 are given a score of 0.” (Hudson, Murph, & Nurius, 1983)


 

Citations

  • Walter W. Hudson, Gerald J. Murphy & Paula S. Nurius (1983) A short‐form scale to measure liberal vs. conservative orientations toward human sexual expression, Journal of Sex Research, 19:3, 258-272, DOI: 10.1080/00224498309551186
  • Sáez Uribarri, Í., & Guijarro Santamaría, C. (2000). Actitudes y experiencia sexual en mujeres jóvenes = Attitudes and sexual experience in young women. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicologica, 9(1), 73–90. psyh.

 

Team comments

This scale was originally validated in an adult population by Hudson, Hudson, Murph, & Nurius.  Therefore, age and validation data presented here are only taken from the work of Uribarri and Santamaría (2000).

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Unknown: Face validity
  • Unknown: Convergent validity
  • Unknown: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading