Teen Attitude Pregnancy Scale (Somers, Johnson, & Sawilowski, 2002)

Attitudes and intentions regarding pregnancy in adolescents; 16 items / 4 Item Subscales, Age M = 15.98
  • Populations: Adolescents
  • Age ranges: Range not reported, Sample M = 15.98
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: United States

Items

Subscales:

  • Future Orientation
  • Realism about Child Rearing
  • Personal Intetions
  • Sexual Self-efficacy

 

Items by subscale (taken from Somers, Johnson, & Sawilowski (2002) mean score reporting and may not represent exact wording)

Future Orientation

  • Important to finish highschool
  • A child impedes highschool education
  • Have plan to further education
  • A child impedes post highschool education

Realism about Child Rearing

  • Can care for child by myself
  • Responsible to be a parent
  • Financially able to be a parent
  • Emotionally able to be a parent

Personal Intentions

  • Knowledge of how to avoid pregnancy
  • Birth control is important
  • Avoid STDs
  • Use birth control

Sexual Self-Efficacy

  • to resist sex if contraceptives unavailable
  • to use birth control when having sex
  • to delay sex until after high school
  • to resist sex if pressured by partner

Responses 

Items used a 5 point Likert type scale, 1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly disagree (4th subscale labelled 1 = very sure, 5 = very unsure)

Scoring

Not Reported

Citations

Somers, C. L., Johnson, S. A., & Sawilowsky, S. S. (2002). A measure for evaluating the effectiveness of teen pregnancy prevention programs. Psychology in the Schools, 39 (3), 337-342.

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Unknown: Face validity
  • Unknown: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading