Teen Attitude Pregnancy Scale (Somers, Johnson, & Sawilowski, 2002)
- Populations: Adolescents
- Age ranges: Range not reported, Sample M = 15.98
- Languages: English
- Countries: United States
Items
Subscales:
- Future Orientation
- Realism about Child Rearing
- Personal Intetions
- Sexual Self-efficacy
Items by subscale (taken from Somers, Johnson, & Sawilowski (2002) mean score reporting and may not represent exact wording)
Future Orientation
- Important to finish highschool
- A child impedes highschool education
- Have plan to further education
- A child impedes post highschool education
Realism about Child Rearing
- Can care for child by myself
- Responsible to be a parent
- Financially able to be a parent
- Emotionally able to be a parent
Personal Intentions
- Knowledge of how to avoid pregnancy
- Birth control is important
- Avoid STDs
- Use birth control
Sexual Self-Efficacy
- to resist sex if contraceptives unavailable
- to use birth control when having sex
- to delay sex until after high school
- to resist sex if pressured by partner
Responses
Items used a 5 point Likert type scale, 1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly disagree (4th subscale labelled 1 = very sure, 5 = very unsure)
Scoring
Not Reported
Citations
Somers, C. L., Johnson, S. A., & Sawilowsky, S. S. (2002). A measure for evaluating the effectiveness of teen pregnancy prevention programs. Psychology in the Schools, 39 (3), 337-342.
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Unknown: Face validity
- Unknown: Convergent validity
- Green: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available