Sociosexual Orientation Index (Bendixen et al., 2024)

Beliefs about sexual and parasexual behaviours in adolescents; 5 Items, Ages 13-16
  • Populations: Adolescents
  • Age ranges: 13-16
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: Germany; Norway

Items

Item Stem:

“If there is a person you are not in a relationship with or in love with, how OK is it for you to…”

  • French/Deep Kissing
  • Intimate Touching
  • To be naked in bed with another person
  • To have oral sex
  • To have sexual intercourse

 

Responses

Items used a 5 point Likert-type scale, 1 = Never OK, 2 = Hardly ever OK, 3 = Sometimes OK, 4 = Most often OK, 5 = Always OK

Scoring

Not Reported

Citations

  • Bendixen, M., Kessler, A. M., Doebell, A., Rynning, C. M. W.,  Sætersdal, A., & Kennair, L. E. O. (2024). Young adolescent boys’ and girls’ attitudes toward uncommitted sexual behaviors and the perception of interest in sexual exploration in opposite-gender relations. Acta Psychologica, 249, 104479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104479

Team comments

Construct validity for this measure was evaluated with both the 5 item and a 4 item version.  The 4 item version excluded “French/Deep Kissing”.  While both versions reached our threshold for construct validity, the 4 item version did demonstrate notably higher validity arguments, please see Bendixen et al., 2024 for further information.

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Unknown: Face validity
  • Unknown: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading