Slut-Shaming Instrument (Martin-Storey et al., 2022)

Experences of slut shaming in adolescent girls; 7 Items, Ages 14 - 17
  • Populations: Adolescents
  • Age ranges: 14-17
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: Canada

Items

Item Stem: “Has anyone ever...”

  • Made a negative comment about you having too many sexual parnters, or because they thought you had too many sexual partners?
  • Said that your clothes were too provactive, that the way you dress is too distracting, or that you dressed provocatively to attract attention?
  • Used words like “slut,” “ho,” “easy,” or “skank” to describe you or your behavior in a mean way?
  • Blamed you or told you “what did you expect” when you were upset about people making sexual comments about your appearance or behavior?
  • Were you ever left out of a group of people or excluded from an activity because of what people thought about your sexual behavior, or because they thought you dressed or acted too sexy?
  • Try to make you feel dirty or ashamed about the way you were dressed?
  • Try to make you feel dirty or ashamed about your sexual behavior?
  • Accused you of certain types of sexual behavior because of who your friends are (e.g., because you hang out with boys)?

 

Responses

Item responses ranged from 0 (never) to 3 (more than five times)

Scoring

Responses were summed, and Higher scores indicated more experiences of slut shaming. (Martin-Storey et al., 2022)

Citations

Martin-Storey, A., Dirks, M., Paquette, G., Boutin, S., Dryburgh, N. S. J., Leduc, K., Bolduc, M., & Temcheff, C. (2023). The slut-shaming instrument: Preliminary validation, correlates, and links with psychological distress among adolescent girls. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 33(4), 1447-1457. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12876

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Green: Face validity
  • Green: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading