Slut-Shaming Instrument (Martin-Storey et al., 2022)
- Populations: Adolescents
- Age ranges: 14-17
- Languages: English
- Countries: Canada
Items
Item Stem: “Has anyone ever...”
- Made a negative comment about you having too many sexual parnters, or because they thought you had too many sexual partners?
- Said that your clothes were too provactive, that the way you dress is too distracting, or that you dressed provocatively to attract attention?
- Used words like “slut,” “ho,” “easy,” or “skank” to describe you or your behavior in a mean way?
- Blamed you or told you “what did you expect” when you were upset about people making sexual comments about your appearance or behavior?
- Were you ever left out of a group of people or excluded from an activity because of what people thought about your sexual behavior, or because they thought you dressed or acted too sexy?
- Try to make you feel dirty or ashamed about the way you were dressed?
- Try to make you feel dirty or ashamed about your sexual behavior?
- Accused you of certain types of sexual behavior because of who your friends are (e.g., because you hang out with boys)?
Responses
Item responses ranged from 0 (never) to 3 (more than five times)
Scoring
Responses were summed, and Higher scores indicated more experiences of slut shaming. (Martin-Storey et al., 2022)
Citations
Martin-Storey, A., Dirks, M., Paquette, G., Boutin, S., Dryburgh, N. S. J., Leduc, K., Bolduc, M., & Temcheff, C. (2023). The slut-shaming instrument: Preliminary validation, correlates, and links with psychological distress among adolescent girls. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 33(4), 1447-1457. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12876
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Green: Face validity
- Green: Convergent validity
- Green: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available