Sexual Wellbeing in Adolescence Scale (Adol-SW) (Turner et al, 2026)

Brief measure of adolescent sexual wellbeing for use in health surveys, 13 items, adolescents aged 14-19
  • Populations: Adolescents 
  • Age ranges: 14-19
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: United Kingdom

Items

I feel confident I could get sexual health support (e.g. condoms, contraception, testing for sexually transmitted infections) if I needed it.

I have someone that I can talk with openly about sex and relationships.

If I were to have a bad sexual experience, I have someone I can talk to.

Thinking about sex makes me feel ashamed.

The idea of having sex makes me feel anxious.

I feel left out when people talk about sex.

I feel comfortable with who I am attracted to (e.g. boys, girls, any gender, no one).

I’m anxious that someone might try to touch me in sexual ways I don’t want.

I feel pressure to do things sexually that I don’t want to.

I worry that if someone asked me out, they would only want sex.

I worry about being bad at sex. 

Most days I feel attractive. 

I feel anxious about what others will think of my naked body. 

Scoring

Answer options: strongly agree; agree; neither agree nor disagree; disagree; strongly disagree. 

Citations

Billie Turner Melissa Palmer, Raquel Bosó Pérez, Ruth Lewis, Lucia F. O’Sullivan, Sally McManus, Chris Bonell, Elizabeth McDermott, Kirstin R. Mitchell (2026). Development and validation of the sexual wellbeing in Adolescence Scale (Adol-SW): A brief measure for adolescent health surveys, SSM - Mental Health, Volume 10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2026.100672.

Team comments

The Adol-SW measure was designed by the Good Measure project team as a key output of the Good Measure project. 

If you are interested in using this measure, please contact kirstin.mitchell@glasgow.ac.uk

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Green: Face validity
  • Green: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Red: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Green: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading