Sexual Self-Concept Items (Breakwell & Millward, 1997)
- Populations: Adolescents, Young Adults
- Age ranges: 16-19
- Languages: English
- Countries: United Kingdom
Items
Subscales
Males:
- SocioEmotional Sexuality
- Relationship Sexuality
Females:
- Sexual Assertiveness
Items were not reported as used, the following descriptors were used to describe individual items:
- Romantic
- Passive
- Responsibility for contraception
- Likely to exploit
- Keen to experiment
- Ignorant about eroticism
- Faithful
- Pretend to enjoy sex
- In control when sex happens
- Passionate
- Unwilling to have sex before marriage
- Likely to seduce
- Interested in sex
- Sensitive to partner’s sexual needs
Responses
Items used a 5 point Likert-type scale, 1 = “strongly agree”, 5 = “strongly disagree”
Scoring
Not Reported
Citations
Breakwell, G. M., & Millward, L. J. (1997). Sexual self-concept and sexual risk-taking. Journal of Adolescence (London, England.), 20(1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1996.0062
Team comments
Please note that in the case of Convergent validity, the “Males” and “Relationshiop Sexuality” measures did show correlations, but these were weak and did not meet our significance threshold. However, the “Females” subscale achieved this threshold.
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Unknown: Face validity
- Green: Convergent validity
- Green: Construct validity
Reliability
- Red: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available