Sexual Self-Concept Items (Breakwell & Millward, 1997)

Importance of sex in self image and the relationship of some risk taking behaviours with sexual activity in adolescents and young adults; 14 Items, Ages 16-19
  • Populations: Adolescents, Young Adults
  • Age ranges: 16-19
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: United Kingdom

Items

Subscales

Males: 

  • SocioEmotional Sexuality
  • Relationship Sexuality

Females:

  • Sexual Assertiveness

 

Items were not reported as used, the following descriptors were used to describe individual items:

  • Romantic
  • Passive
  • Responsibility for contraception
  • Likely to exploit
  • Keen to experiment
  • Ignorant about eroticism
  • Faithful
  • Pretend to enjoy sex
  • In control when sex happens
  • Passionate
  • Unwilling to have sex before marriage
  • Likely to seduce
  • Interested in sex
  • Sensitive to partner’s sexual needs

 

Responses

Items used a 5 point Likert-type scale, 1 = “strongly agree”, 5 = “strongly disagree”

Scoring

Not Reported

Citations

Breakwell, G. M., & Millward, L. J. (1997). Sexual self-concept and sexual risk-taking. Journal of Adolescence (London, England.), 20(1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1996.0062

Team comments

Please note that in the case of Convergent validity, the “Males” and “Relationshiop Sexuality” measures did show correlations, but these were weak and did not meet our significance threshold.  However, the “Females” subscale achieved this threshold.

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Unknown: Face validity
  • Green: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Red: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading