Sexual Relationship Rights Measure (Berglas et al., 2017)
- Populations: Hispanic adolescent population in Los Angeles, California
- Age ranges: 13-15* see team comments
- Languages: English
- Countries: United States
Items
Final measure not provided in paper, items listed here are the original pool of items used to generate the final measure.
Item stem:
A person who is in a sexual relationship with a steady partner (like a boyfriend or girlfriend) always has the right to…
- say no to sex
- know if partner is having sex with someone else
- stop having sex with partner at any time
- insist on using condoms or birth control
- insist that partner get tested for STIs or HIV
- say what they need or want
- ask about partner’s past sexual experiences
- talk about what they want to do when having sex
- end the relationship for any reason they choose
- talk about condoms or birth control
- tell partner that they would like to have sex
- talk about what does/doesn’t feel good during sex
- have time away from their partner
- have equal say in all decisions about sex
- say no to sexual things that make them uncomfortable
- refuse to have sex, without giving a reason why
- stop what they’re doing during sex at any time
Responses:
Each item is measured on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree)
Scoring
Not Reported
Citations
Nancy F. Berglas, Norman A. Constantine, Petra Jerman & Louise A.Rohrbach (2017) Development and Assessment of Measures of Adolescents’ Attitudesabout Sexual Relationship Rights, International Journal of Sexual Health, 29:2, 135-146, DOI:10.1080/19317611.2016.1256364
Team comments
Per (Berglas et al., 2017), 90% of sample were 14 or 15 years old, 9% 13 or younger, 1% 16 or older. For <13 and >16 sample, age range not provided, range edited to 13-15 for brevity.
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Green: Face validity
- Unknown: Convergent validity
- Green: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available