Sexual Relationship Rights Measure (Berglas et al., 2017)

Attitudes about sexual relationship rights in adolescents. 10 Items, Ages: 90% 13-15
  • Populations: Hispanic adolescent population in Los Angeles, California
  • Age ranges: 13-15* see team comments
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: United States

Items

Final measure not provided in paper, items listed here are the original pool of items used to generate the final measure.

 

Item stem:

A person who is in a sexual relationship with a steady partner (like a boyfriend or girlfriend) always has the right to…

  • say no to sex
  • know if partner is having sex with someone else
  • stop having sex with partner at any time
  • insist on using condoms or birth control
  • insist that partner get tested for STIs or HIV
  • say what they need or want
  • ask about partner’s past sexual experiences
  • talk about what they want to do when having sex
  • end the relationship for any reason they choose
  • talk about condoms or birth control
  • tell partner that they would like to have sex
  • talk about what does/doesn’t feel good during sex
  • have time away from their partner
  • have equal say in all decisions about sex
  • say no to sexual things that make them uncomfortable
  • refuse to have sex, without giving a reason why
  • stop what they’re doing during sex at any time

 

Responses:

Each item is measured on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree)

Scoring

Not Reported

Citations

Nancy F. Berglas, Norman A. Constantine, Petra Jerman & Louise A.Rohrbach (2017) Development and Assessment of Measures of Adolescents’ Attitudesabout Sexual Relationship Rights, International Journal of Sexual Health, 29:2, 135-146, DOI:10.1080/19317611.2016.1256364

Team comments

Per (Berglas et al., 2017), 90% of sample were 14 or 15 years old, 9% 13 or younger, 1% 16 or older.  For <13 and >16 sample, age range not provided, range edited to 13-15 for brevity.

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Green: Face validity
  • Unknown: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading