Sexual Orientation Microaggression Inventory (Swann et al., 2016)
- Populations: Adolescents, young adults.
- Age ranges: 16-20
- Languages: English
- Countries: United States
Items
Subscales
- Anti-gay attitudes and expressions, 6 Items
- Denial of Homosexuality, 3 Items
- Heterosexism, 5 Items
- Societal Disapproval, 5 Items
Items by Subscale
- Anti-gay attitudes and expressions, 6 Items
- You heard someone say “that’s so gay” in a negative way?
- You were told not to “act so gay”
- Someone said, “you are not like those gay people”
- Someone said, “you know how gay people are”
- Someone expressed a stereotype (example: “gay men are so good at fashion”)
- You heard someone talk about “the gay lifestyle”
- Denial of Homosexuality, 3 Items
- You were told you just haven’t found the right person of the opposite sex
- You were told that being gay is just a phase.
- A family member expressed disappointment about you being gay, lesbian, or bisexual
- Heterosexism, 5 Items
- You were told you’re not a “real” man/woman
- A heterosexual person said you are being “paranoid” when you suspect someone treated you in a homophobic way
- A heterosexual person didn’t believe that gay, lesbian, and bisexual people face discrimination
- You were told you were overreacting when you talked about a negative experience you had because of your sexual orientation
- A heterosexual denied they have any heterosexism (example: “As a person of color, I’m offended that you would imply I could be homophobic”)
- Societal Disapproval, 5 Items
- You saw a group either in person or in the media show negative signs (example: A religious group with a sign that said “God hates fags”)
- Someone said gay, lesbian, and bisexual people are trying to get “special rights” that they don’t deserve
- Someone said, “I don’t mind gay people, they just shouldn’t be so public”
- Someone said a hateful slur about gay, lesbian, and bisexual people (example: “fag”or “dyke” said in a mean way)
- Someone said homosexuality is a sin or immoral
Responses
Items used a 5 Item ordinal scale ranging from “not at all” to “about every day”
Scoring
Not Reported
Citations
Swann, G., Minshew, R., Newcomb, M. E., & Mustanski, B. (2016). Validation of the sexual orientation microaggression inventory in two diverse samples of LGBTQ youth. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(6), 1289-1298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0718-2
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Unknown: Face validity
- Green: Convergent validity
- Green: Construct validity
Reliability
- Unknown: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available