Sexual Mindfulness Measure (Leavitt et al., 2020)

Maintenance of mindfulness during sexual experiences in sexually active adolescents. 7 Items, Ages 13-18.
  • Populations: Sexually Active Adolescents
  • Age ranges: 13–18 Two samples taken:13–15, 16–18
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: United States

Items

  • I pay attention to sexual sensations. 
  • I pay attention to how sex affects my thoughts and behavior. 
  • I can usually describe how I feel sexually at the moment in considerable detail. 
  • I pay attention to my emotions during sex. 
  • During sex, I sometimes get distracted by evaluating myself or my partner.
  • During sex, I sometimes get tense when I have a thought I’m not comfortable with.
  • Sometimes when I get a certain thought in my head, it ruins the whole sexual experience

 

Responses

Items used 5 point Likert-type scale, 1 = Never or rarely true, 5 = Very often or always true

Scoring

“Participants responded to four statements relating to the awareness aspect of sexual mindfulness and three statements relating to the non-judgment aspect of sexual mindfulness using a Likert scale of 1 (never or rarely True) to 5 (very often or always true). Negative items were reverse scored such that higher scores reflected greater sexual mindfulness.”  (Leavitt et al., 2020)

Citations

Leavitt, C. E., Allsop, D. B., Busby, D. M., Driggs, S. M., Johnson, H. M., & Saxey, M. T. (2020). Associations of mindfulness with adolescent outcomes and sexuality. Journal of Adolescence, 81(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.04.008

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Unknown: Face validity
  • Green: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading