Sexual Health and HIV Risk Stratification Scale (Han et al., 2021)

10 - Item measure of risk factors associated with heightened vulnerability to HIV in sexually active Adolescent Girls and Young Women in Tanzania.
  • Populations: Sexually active Tanzanian women not currently in school
  • Age ranges: 15-24 years
  • Languages: Kiswahili
  • Countries: Tanzania

Items

  • Have ever had anal sex
  • Have ever experienced sexual violence
  • Have ever experienced physical violence
  • In the past one month, have gone to sleep at night hungry because there was no food
  • Do not have an adult whom I can go for financial support
  • Do not have an adult whom I can go for emotional support
  • Had first sex at 15 years of age or below
  • Have had concurrent sexual partners in the past 12 months
  • Have had sex with anyone because he provided gifts or helped pay for things
  • My current partner(s) is HIV-positive or have unknown HIV status

Responses:

Responses were binary yes / no

Scoring

Each item was assigned an ascending risk score ranging from 0 to 3, with 0 being no risk and 3 being the highest risk.

Citations

Han, H., Yang, F., Murray, S., Mbita, G., Bangser, M., Rucinski, K., Komba, A., Casalini, C., Drake, M., Majani, E., Curran, K., Mlawa, Y., Junga, A., Zoungrana, J., Kategile, U., Ramadhani, A., Xue, Q.-L., & Baral, S. (2021). Characterizing a sexual health and HIV risk stratification scale for sexually active adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in Tanzania. PLOS ONE, 16(3), e0248153. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248153

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Green: Face validity
  • Unknown: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Red: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading