Sexual Experiences Survey Short Form Victimization (Moreau et al., 2015; adapted from Koss et al., 2007)

Sexual violence victimization in Middle and Late Adolescents; 10 Items, ages 14-19
  • Populations: Middle & Late Adolescents
  • Age ranges: 14-19
  • Languages: French, English
  • Countries: Canada

Items

Items assess sex acts resulting from various tactics including

  • pressure, lies or false promises
  • anger or criticism
  • incapacity of victim to refuse due to alcohol or drugs
  • threat of physical force
  • use of physical force or a weapon

Example Items [Moreau et al., 2015]

  • “forced to be filmed or photographed during sexual activities”
  • “forced to have sex in the context of prostitution”

Scoring

We computed a dichotomous score (0 = no victimization, 1 ≥ victimization) based on having experienced at least one episode of sexual violence.

Citations

  • Stéphanie Couture, Martine Hébert & Mylène Fernet (2024) Validation of a French-Canadian adaptation of the Hurlbert Index of Sexual Assertiveness for adolescents, Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 39:4, 1106-1123, DOI: 10.1080/14681994.2022.2067981
  • Moreau, C., Boucher, S., Hébert, M., & Lemelin, J. (2015). Capturing sexual violence experiences among battered women using the revised Sexual Experiences Survey and the revised Conflict Tactics Scales. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(1), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0345-8

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Unknown: Face validity
  • Green: Convergent validity
  • Unknown: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Unknown: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading