Sexual Communication Self-Efficacy Scale (Quinn-Nilas et al., 2016)
- Populations: Adolescents, young adults
- Age ranges: 16-22
- Languages: English
- Countries: United Kingdom
Items
Subscales
- Contraceptive Communication;
- Positive Sexual Messages;
- Negative Sexual Messages;
- Sexual History;
- Condom Negotiation
Item Examples by Subcscale
Contraceptive Communication
- Talk about how it feels to use a condom?
- Talk about how to put on a condom?
- Talk about whether a condom is on correctly?
Positive Sexual Messages
- Suggest a new sexual activity (e.g., a new sexual position)?
- Tell them you would like to have sex more often?
- Tell them that a sexual activity feels good?
- Tell them that you want to have sex?
- Tell them that you like a specific sexual activity?
- Initiate sex?
Negative Sexual Messages
- Tell them a certain sexual activity hurts you?
- Tell them if a certain sexual activity makes you uncomfortable?
- Tell them that a certain sexual activity is not making you feel good?
- Tell them you do not want to have sex?
Sexual History
- Ask how many partners they have had?
- Ask if they have ever shared needles?
- Ask if they are having sex with other people?
- Ask if they have ever had a sexually transmitted infection?
Condom Negotiation
- Ask if a condom could be used for sex with them?
- Demand that a condom be used?
- Refuse to have sex if they won’t use a condom?
Responses
Items used a 4 point Likert-type scale, 1 = very difficult, 4 = very easy
Scoring
“The scale is scored using a 4-point scale: 1 (Very difficult), 2 (Difficult), 3 (Easy), and 4 (Very easy). None of the items are reverse scored. There are five subscales; their respective scores are calculated by taking the means of the subscale’s items.” (Quinn-Nilas et al., 2020)
Citations
Quinn-Nilas, C., Milhausen, R. R., Breuer, R., Bailey, J., Pavlou, M., DiClemente, R. J., & Wingood, G. M. (2016). Validation of the sexual communication self-efficacy scale. Health Education & Behavior, 43(2), 165-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198115598986
Quinn-Nilas, C., Milhausen, R. R., Breuer, R., Bailey, J., Pavlou, M., DiClemente, R. J., & Wingood, G. M.(2020). Sexual Communication Self-Efficacy Scale. In R. R. Milhausen, J. K. Sakaluk, T. D. Fischer, C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures, 4th edition (233-235). Routledge.
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Unknown: Face validity
- Green: Convergent validity
- Green: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Green: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available