Sexual Assault Coping Self Efficacy Measure (Pankau, 2021)

Individuals' belief in their capacity to cope with sexual assault in adolescents; 19 Items, Ages 13-17
  • Populations: Adolescents, Young Adults, Adults
  • Age ranges: 13-17, 18-26, and 26+
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: United States

Items

  • Feeling good about myself
  • Managing my housing, food clothes, and medical needs 
  • Handling feelings of hopelessness and helplessness 
  • Controlling thoughts that I am going crazy 
  • Managing my feelings of guilt and self-shame about the assault 
  • Handling fears of anger/rage at my relationship with the assailant 
  • Controlling feelings of anxiety and panic 
  • Coping with loneliness and isolation 
  • Dealing with nightmares/flashbacks concerning the assault 
  • Dealing with feelings of shame concerning the assault 
  • Coping with feelings completely overwhelmed by everything 
  • Being able to concentrate and effectively handle personal responsibilites
  • Controlling thoughts that “I just can’t handle this”
  • Trusting others
  • Dealing with feelings of sadness
  • Controlling negative thoughts about myself
  • Coping with the feelings that family and friends just don’t understand
  • Handling feelings of embarrassment
  • Handling feelings of inadequacy

 

Responses:

Items used a 5 point Likert type scale, 1 = not at all capable, 5 = totally capable.

Scoring

Not reported

Citations

Pankau, Thomas, “Psychometrics of a Measure of Sexual Assault Coping Self-Efficacy: A Comparison of Across Age Groups” (2021). Clinical Psychology Disseratations. 70. https://digitalcommons.spu.edu/cpy_etd/70

Team comments

This scale was validated on three subsamples aged 13-17, 18-26, and 26+, with eldest member of 26+ sample reported at 60 years of age.  For reporting purposes here, validation data pertain to the 13-17 sample.

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Unknown: Face validity
  • Green: Convergent validity
  • Red: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Green: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading