Sexual Assault Coping Self Efficacy Measure (Pankau, 2021)
- Populations: Adolescents, Young Adults, Adults
- Age ranges: 13-17, 18-26, and 26+
- Languages: English
- Countries: United States
Items
- Feeling good about myself
- Managing my housing, food clothes, and medical needs
- Handling feelings of hopelessness and helplessness
- Controlling thoughts that I am going crazy
- Managing my feelings of guilt and self-shame about the assault
- Handling fears of anger/rage at my relationship with the assailant
- Controlling feelings of anxiety and panic
- Coping with loneliness and isolation
- Dealing with nightmares/flashbacks concerning the assault
- Dealing with feelings of shame concerning the assault
- Coping with feelings completely overwhelmed by everything
- Being able to concentrate and effectively handle personal responsibilites
- Controlling thoughts that “I just can’t handle this”
- Trusting others
- Dealing with feelings of sadness
- Controlling negative thoughts about myself
- Coping with the feelings that family and friends just don’t understand
- Handling feelings of embarrassment
- Handling feelings of inadequacy
Responses:
Items used a 5 point Likert type scale, 1 = not at all capable, 5 = totally capable.
Scoring
Not reported
Citations
Pankau, Thomas, “Psychometrics of a Measure of Sexual Assault Coping Self-Efficacy: A Comparison of Across Age Groups” (2021). Clinical Psychology Disseratations. 70. https://digitalcommons.spu.edu/cpy_etd/70
Team comments
This scale was validated on three subsamples aged 13-17, 18-26, and 26+, with eldest member of 26+ sample reported at 60 years of age. For reporting purposes here, validation data pertain to the 13-17 sample.
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Unknown: Face validity
- Green: Convergent validity
- Red: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Green: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available