Sexual And Reproductive Empowerment (Upadhyay et al., 2021)
- Populations: Adolescents, Young Adults
- Age ranges: 15-24
- Languages: English, Dholuo, Kiswahili,
- Countries: Kenya; United States
Items
Subscales
- Comfort talking with partner,
- Choice of partners, marriage, and children,
- Parental support,
- Sexual safety,
- Self-love,
- Sense of future,
- Sexual Pleasure,
Items by subscale
Comfort talking with partner
- If I had a romantic partner, I would feel comfortable talking about whether or not I want to have children with them.
- If I had a sexual partner, I would feel comfortable telling that person if I wanted to use a method to protect against infection or pregnancy, even when they did not want to
- If I had a romantic partner, I would feel comfortable voicing disagreements with them.
Choice of partners, marriage, and children
- I can freely choose if I get married
- I can freely choose who I marry
- I have the power to control if and when I have children
Parental support
- I have a parent or guardian who would help me with my problems and troubles if I needed
- I have a parent or guardian who accepts me as I am
- I have a parent or guardian who trusts me to make the right decisions.
- I have a parent or guardian who helps me achieve my goals in life.
Sexual safety
- I am able to do the things I want to do without worrying about my safety.
- Walking down the street, I feel like my body is my own.
- I do not feel afraid that I will be forced to do something sexually when I do not want to.
- I feel safe in my current living situation.
Self-love
- I like myself.
- I am worthy of love.
- I know my body well.
- My body belongs to me.
Sense of future
- I can imagine what my future will be like.
- I have an idea of how I can eventually reach my goals.
Sexual Pleasure
- My sexual needs or desires are important.
- I think it would be important to focus on my own pleasure as well as my partner’s during sexual experiences.
- I expect to enjoy sex.
Responses
Items used a 5 point scale, “not at all true” to “extremely true” [numerical values not reported]
Scoring
“All responses were captured on a 5-point Likert scale, with each point increase corresponding to higher empowerment.” (Zia et a., 2024)
Citations
- Upadhyay, U. D., Danza, P. Y., Neilands, T. B., Gipson, J. D., Brindis, C. D., Hindin, M. J., Foster, D. G., & Dworkin, S. L. (2021). Development and Validation of the Sexual and Reproductive Empowerment Scale for Adolescents and Young Adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 68(1), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.05.031
- Zia, Y., Upadhyay, U., Rhew, I., Kimanthi, S., Congo, O., Onono, M., Barnabas, R., Mugo, N., Bukusi, E. A., & Harrington, E. K. (2024). Confirmatory factor analysis and validation of the sexual and reproductive empowerment scale for adolescents and young adults in kenya. Studies in Family Planning, 55(2), 85-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12263
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Green: Face validity
- Green: Convergent validity
- Green: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available