Sexual And Reproductive Empowerment (Upadhyay et al., 2021)

Constructs of community voice, self efficacy, and social support relating to sexual and reproductive life among adolescents and young adults; 23 Items, 2-4 Item subscales, Ages 15-24
  • Populations: Adolescents, Young Adults
  • Age ranges: 15-24
  • Languages: English, Dholuo, Kiswahili,
  • Countries: Kenya; United States

Items

Subscales

  • Comfort talking with partner,
  • Choice of partners, marriage, and children,
  • Parental support,
  • Sexual safety,
  • Self-love,
  • Sense of future,
  • Sexual Pleasure, 

 

Items by subscale

Comfort talking with partner

  • If I had a romantic partner, I would feel comfortable talking about whether or not I want to have children with them.
  • If I had a sexual partner, I would feel comfortable telling that person if I wanted to use a method to protect against infection or pregnancy, even when they did not want to
  • If I had a romantic partner, I would feel comfortable voicing disagreements with them.

Choice of partners, marriage, and children

  • I can freely choose if I get married
  • I can freely choose who I marry
  • I have the power to control if and when I have children

Parental support

  • I have a parent or guardian who would help me with my problems and troubles if I needed
  • I have a parent or guardian who accepts me as I am
  •  I have a parent or guardian who trusts me to make the right decisions. 
  •  I have a parent or guardian who helps me achieve my goals in life. 

Sexual safety

  •  I am able to do the things I want to do without worrying about my safety.
  • Walking down the street, I feel like my body is my own. 
  • I do not feel afraid that I will be forced to do something sexually when I do not want to.
  • I feel safe in my current living situation.

Self-love

  • I like myself. 
  • I am worthy of love. 
  • I know my body well. 
  • My body belongs to me.

Sense of future

  • I can imagine what my future will be like. 
  • I have an idea of how I can eventually reach my goals. 

Sexual Pleasure

  • My sexual needs or desires are important. 
  •  I think it would be important to focus on my own pleasure as well as my partner’s during sexual experiences.
  • I expect to enjoy sex. 

 

Responses

Items used a 5 point scale, “not at all true” to “extremely true” [numerical values not reported]

Scoring

“All responses were captured on a 5-point Likert scale, with each point increase corresponding to higher empowerment.” (Zia et a., 2024)

Citations

  • Upadhyay, U. D., Danza, P. Y., Neilands, T. B., Gipson, J. D., Brindis, C. D., Hindin, M. J., Foster, D. G., & Dworkin, S. L. (2021). Development and Validation of the Sexual and Reproductive Empowerment Scale for Adolescents and Young Adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 68(1), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.05.031
  • Zia, Y., Upadhyay, U., Rhew, I., Kimanthi, S., Congo, O., Onono, M., Barnabas, R., Mugo, N., Bukusi, E. A., & Harrington, E. K. (2024). Confirmatory factor analysis and validation of the sexual and reproductive empowerment scale for adolescents and young adults in kenya. Studies in Family Planning, 55(2), 85-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12263

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Green: Face validity
  • Green: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading