Sexting Behaviours and Motives Questionnaire (del Rey, Ojeda, & Casas, 2021)

Reasons for and presentation of sexting behaviours in Adolescents; 39 Items / 4-9 Item subscales; Ages 12-18
  • Populations: Adolescents
  • Age ranges: 12-18
  • Languages: Spanish, English
  • Countries: Bosnia and Herzegovina; Croatia; Spain

Items

Subscales

  • Sending: 6
  • Reasons for sending: 9
  • Victim of forwarding: 5
  • Receiving: 6
  • Forwarding: 4
  • Reasons for Forwarding: 9

 

Items by Item Stem

 I’ve sent...

  • suggestive or sexual text messages about myself to my partner/ex-partner
  • suggestive or sexual videos or images of myself to my partner/ex-partner
  • suggestive or sexual text messages about myself to somebody I fancied
  • suggestive or sexual videos or images of myself to somebody I fancied
  • suggestive or sexual text messages about myself to a friend
  • suggestive or sexual videos or images of myself to a friend

If I’ve sent something, the reason was:

  • To flirt with someone
  • Because most people do it
  • As a joke/to entertain myself
  • Because it’s normal in dating relationships
  • Because I was threatened/blackmailed
  • Because I felt pressured by my partner or someone I fancied
  • Because I felt pressured by my friends
  • Because I thought it was a good idea or I looked attractive
  •  Because I did it accidentally

If I’ve sent something, it has been forwarded or shared without my consent by:

  • My girlfriend/ex-girlfriend or a girl I fancied
  • My boyfriend/ex-boyfriend or a boy I fancied
  • A male friend
  • A female friend 
  • Others

I’ve received...

  • suggestive or sexual text messages about and from my partner/ex-partner
  • suggestive or sexual videos or images about and from my partner/ex-partner
  • suggestive or sexual text messages about and from somebody I fancied
  • suggestive or sexual videos or images about and from somebody I fancied
  • suggestive or sexual text messages about and from a friend
  • suggestive or sexual videos or images about and from a friend

When received, I’ve forwarded or shared...

  • suggestive or sexual text messages of other people
  • suggestive or sexual videos or images of other people

If I’ve forwarded something, the reason was:

  • Because our relationship had ended
  •  To upset the person that appeared
  • Out of jealousy
  • To impress others
  • As a joke/to entertain myself
  • Because most people do it
  • Because my friends pressured me to do it
  • Because I had the consent of the person who appeared
  • Because I did it accidentally

I’ve been forwarded....

  • private suggestive or sexual text messages that other people had sent
  • private suggestive or sexual videos or images that other people had sent

 

 

Responses

“Five response options [measure] behaviour frequency: 0 = never; 1 = less than once a month; 2 = monthly; 3 = weekly; and 4 = daily.”  (del Rey, Ojeda, & Casas, 2021)

Scoring

Higher score indicates higher frequency of construct of interest for all scales.

Citations

  • del Rey, R., Ojeda, M., & Casas, J. A. (2021). Validation of the sexting behavior and motives questionnaire (SBM-Q). Psicothema, 33(2), 287-295. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2020.207
  • Spanish version of items (not in initial report and thus not included here):
    https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.fi gshare.13625645 (del Rey, Ojeda, & Casas, 2021)
  • Ojeda, M., Dodaj, A., Casas, J. A., Sesar, K., & Del Rey, R. (2025). Cross-cultural validation of the sexting behaviors and motives questionnaire (SBM-Q). Psicothema, 37(1), 60-70. https://doi.org/10.70478/psicothema.2025.37.07

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Green: Face validity
  • Green: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Green: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading