Self-Efficacy for Abstinence (Stallworth et al., 2004)

Predictors of perceceived capacity to engage in sexual abstinence in adolescents and young adults; 8 Items, Ages 13-19
  • Populations: Adolescents, Young Adults
  • Age ranges: 13-19
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: Jamaica

Items

  • I would refuse to have sex even if my boyfriend or girlfriend threatened to break up with me. 
  • I can make up my own mind about how far to go when it comes to sex. 
  • I can stay out of situations/places that lead to being pressured to have sex. 
  • I can stay away from people who would pressure me into having sex. 
  • I can say no to sex with a guy/girl I have a crush on. 
  • I can make someone who loves me understand why 1 don’t want to have sex. 
  • I can make someone who loves me wait until I am ready to have sex. 
  • I can say no to sex even if all my friends are sexually active. 

 

Responses

Items used  a 4 point Likert-Type, 4=strongly agree, 3=agree, 2=disagree, and l=strongly disagree

Scoring

“Higher scores on the scale represent better self-efficacy.” (Stallworth et al., 2004)

Citations

Stallworth, J., Roofe, M., Clark, L. F., Ehiri, J. Ε., Mukherjee, S., Person, S., & Jolly, P. Ε. (2004). Predictors of sexual involvement among adolescents in rural jamaica. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 16(2), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJAMH.2004.16.2.165

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Unknown: Face validity
  • Unknown: Convergent validity
  • Unknown: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading