Reproductive Coercion Scale (McCauley et al., 2017)

Experiences in which women are pressured or forced into pregnancy / risk of pregnancy in adolescent and adult women; 9 Items (5 Item short form); Ages 16-29
  • Populations: adolescent and adult women
  • Age ranges: 16-29 (Sample distribution: 16-20: 38.6%, 21-24: 35.1%, 25-29: 26.3%)
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: United States

Items

Subscales

  • Pregnancy Coercion
  • Condom Manipulation

Items

  • Told you not to use any birth control (like the pill, shot, ring, etc.)
  • Said he would leave you if you didn’t get pregnant
  • Told you he would have a baby with someone else if you didn’t get pregnant
  • Taken your birth control (like pills) away from you or kept you from going to the clinic to get birth control
  • Made you have sex without a condom so you would get pregnant
  • Hurt you physically because you did not agree to get pregnant
  • Taken off the condom while you were having sex, so you would get pregnant
  • Put holes in the condom so you would get pregnant
  • Broken the condom on purpose while you were having sex so you would get pregnant

 

Short Form Items:

Item Stem: “ In the past 3 months, has someone you were dating or going out with:”

Pregnancy Coercion:

  • Told you not to use any birth control (like the pill, shot, ring, etc.)
  • Taken your birth control (like pills) away from you or kept you from going to the clinic to get birth control
  • Made you have sex without a condom so you would get pregnant

Condom Manipulation

  • Taken off the condom while you were having sex, so you would get pregnant
  • Put holes in the condom or broken the condom on purpose so you would get pregnant

Scoring

Not Reported

Citations

McCauley, H. L., Silverman, J. G., Jones, K. A., Tancredi, D. J., Decker, M. R., McCormick, M. C., Austin, S. B., Anderson, H. A., & Miller, E. (2017). Psychometric properties and refinement of the reproductive coercion scale. Contraception (Stoneham), 95(3), 292-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.09.010

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Unknown: Face validity
  • Unknown: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Unknown: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading