Reproductive Coercion Scale (McCauley et al., 2017)
- Populations: adolescent and adult women
- Age ranges: 16-29 (Sample distribution: 16-20: 38.6%, 21-24: 35.1%, 25-29: 26.3%)
- Languages: English
- Countries: United States
Items
Subscales
- Pregnancy Coercion
- Condom Manipulation
Items
- Told you not to use any birth control (like the pill, shot, ring, etc.)
- Said he would leave you if you didn’t get pregnant
- Told you he would have a baby with someone else if you didn’t get pregnant
- Taken your birth control (like pills) away from you or kept you from going to the clinic to get birth control
- Made you have sex without a condom so you would get pregnant
- Hurt you physically because you did not agree to get pregnant
- Taken off the condom while you were having sex, so you would get pregnant
- Put holes in the condom so you would get pregnant
- Broken the condom on purpose while you were having sex so you would get pregnant
Short Form Items:
Item Stem: “ In the past 3 months, has someone you were dating or going out with:”
Pregnancy Coercion:
- Told you not to use any birth control (like the pill, shot, ring, etc.)
- Taken your birth control (like pills) away from you or kept you from going to the clinic to get birth control
- Made you have sex without a condom so you would get pregnant
Condom Manipulation
- Taken off the condom while you were having sex, so you would get pregnant
- Put holes in the condom or broken the condom on purpose so you would get pregnant
Scoring
Not Reported
Citations
McCauley, H. L., Silverman, J. G., Jones, K. A., Tancredi, D. J., Decker, M. R., McCormick, M. C., Austin, S. B., Anderson, H. A., & Miller, E. (2017). Psychometric properties and refinement of the reproductive coercion scale. Contraception (Stoneham), 95(3), 292-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.09.010
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Unknown: Face validity
- Unknown: Convergent validity
- Green: Construct validity
Reliability
- Unknown: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available