Questionnaire to assess the own body for adolescents (Dähne et al., 2004)
- Populations: Adolescents & Young Adults
- Age ranges: 12-20
- Languages: German
- Countries: Germany
Items
This measure is presented using two different models, a 3 Factor and 4 Factor model.
Subscales by model:
3 Factor: 52 Items total
- Uncertainty/discomfort, 19 items
- Attractiveness/self-confidence, 13 Items
- Accentuation of the body/sensitivity, 20 Items
4 Factor: 46 Items total
- Attractiveness/self-confidence, 15 Items
- Accentuation of physical appearance, 12 Items
- Uncertainty/worry, 13 Items
- Physical-sexual discomfort, 6 Items
Example Items by Model & Subscale
3 Factor:
- Uncertainty/discomfort
- I tend to hide my body.
- Attractiveness/self-confidence
- I am satisfied with my appearance.
- Accentuation of the body/sensitivity
- I often look in the mirror.
4 Factor
- Attractiveness/self-confidence
- I am happy with my weight and height.
- Accentuation of physical appearance
- I often and happily observe myself.
- Uncertainty/worry
- My body often does what it wants.
- Physical-sexual discomfort
- I often wish I could feel more.
Responses
Items used a dichotomous answer format, true / false.
Scoring
Not Reported
Citations
Dahne, A., Aßmann, B., & Ettrich, C. (2004). Normwerte für den Fragebogen zur Beurteilung des eigenen Körpers FBeK für Kinder und Jugendliche. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 53(7), 483-496.
Team comments
For the Internal Consistency rating, only the 3-factor model subscales and the 4 Factor model subscale “Attractiveness / Self Confidence” reached our threshold for internal consistency quality.
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Unknown: Face validity
- Unknown: Convergent validity
- Unknown: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available