Problematic Pornography Consumption Scale (Short Version) in Adolescents (Bőthe et al., 2021)
- Populations: Canadian Adolescents
- Age ranges: Range not reported; Age M (SD) = 15.41 (0.57)
- Languages: English, French, Spanish
- Countries: Canada; Mexico; Spain
Items
Subscales:
- Salience
- Tolerance
- Mood Modification
- Relapser
- Withdrawal
- Conflict
Items
- I feel that porn is a big part of my life. (Salience)
- I relax by watching porn. (Mood Modification)
- I participate less than I used to in other fun activities because of the time I spend watching porn. (Conflict)
- I feel that I had to watch more and more porn for satisfaction. (Tolerance)
- When I promise myself not to watch porn anymore, I can only stop for a short time. (Relapse)
- I become stressed when something prevents me from watching porn. (Withdrawal)
Responses:
Items used 7-point scale (1 = never; 7 = all the time)
Scoring
“Participants indicated their answers on a 7-point scale (1 = never; 7 = all the time) regarding the past 6 months. Higher scores indicate higher levels of problematic pornography use (PPU).” (Bőthe et al., 2021)
“Total scores range from 18 to 126, with a score≥76 being considered a cut-off score for high-risk of problematic pornography use. (for the long form)” (Villena‑Moya et al., 2023)
Citations
- Bőthe, B., Vaillancourt-Morel, M.-P., Dion, J., Štulhofer, A., & Bergeron, S. (2021). Validity and reliability of the short version of the Problematic Pornography Consumption Scale (PPCS-6-A) in adolescents. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 35(4), 486–500. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000722
Spanish Versions
- Villena-Moya, A., Granero, R., Chiclana-Actis, C., Potenza, M. N., Blycker, G. R., Demetrovics, Z., Bőthe, B., Steward, T., Fernández-Aranda, F., Jiménez-Murcia, S., & Mestre‑Bach, G. (2024). Spanish validation of the long and short versions of the problematic pornography consumption scale (PPCS and PPCS-6) in adolescents. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 53(2), 673-687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02700-9
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Green: Face validity
- Green: Convergent validity
- Green: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available