Perceived Benefits of Sex scale (Benson & Faas, 2014)

Perceived relational and physical benefits of engaging in sexual behaviour in adolescents; 5 Items, Ages 12-18
  • Populations: Adolescents
  • Age ranges: 12-18
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: United States

Items

Some people have sexual intercourse before they get married. Others do not. For these questions, it doesn’t matter whether you yourself have had intercourse. Just indicate whether you agree or disagree with the statements.

  • If you had sexual intercourse, your friends would respect you more.
  • If you had sexual intercourse, it would give you a great deal of physical pleasure.
  • If you had sexual intercourse, it would relax you.
  • If you had sexual intercourse, it would make you more attractive to the opposite sex.
  • If you had sexual intercourse, you would feel less lonely.

 

Responses

Items used a 5 point Likert-type scale, 1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree

Scoring

Not Reported

Citations

Benson, M. J., & Faas, C., (2014). Assessing adolescent contexts: Measures of families, peers, schools, and neighborhoods. International Journal of Child and Adolescent Health, 7(1), 53-69.

Team comments

This measure was developed as part of the Battery of Adolescent Measures, 4 of which are reported in the Good Measure project:

Parent Disapproval of Sex scale;
Perceived Benefits of Sex scale;
Perceived Consequences of Sex scale;
Perceived Hassle with Birth Control scale;

All Measures were developed alongside each other by Benson and Faas (2014)

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Unknown: Face validity
  • Unknown: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading