Peer Sexual Harassment Scale—Child (Valik et al., 2022)
- Populations: Children
- Age ranges: 9-11
Items
Subscales
- Victimization, 6 Items
- Perpetration, 6 Items
- Witnessing, 6 Items
Items by subscale
Victimization
Has any student done any of these things to you, even though you did not want it?
- Touched your private body parts (for example, penis, vulva, bottom, or breasts)?
- Kissed or hugged you, or tried to?
- Called you homo, fag, dyke, or the like?
- Called you dick, cunt, slut, or the like?
- Commented on or joked about private body parts (forvexample, penis, vulva, bottom, or breasts) or about sex?
- Shown, sent, or given you pictures or messages related to nakedness or sex?
Perpetration
Have you done any of these things to another student, even though they did not want it?
- Touched another student’s private body parts (for example, penis, vulva, bottom, or breasts)?
- Kissed or hugged another student, or tried to?
- Called another student homo, gay, lesbian, or the like?
- Called another student dick, cunt, slut, or the like?
- Made comments or jokes about private body parts (for example, penis, vulva, bottom, or breasts) or sex?
Shown, sent, or given another student pictures or messages related to nakedness or sex?
Witnessing
Have you seen or heard that any of this has happened to any other student at the school, even though they did not want it?
- A student touched another students’ private body parts (for example, penis, vulva, bottom, or breasts)?
- A student kissed or hugged another student, or tried to?
- A student called another student homo, gay, lesbian or the like?
- A student called another student dick, cunt, slut, or the like?
- A student made comments or jokes about private body parts (for example, penis, vulva, bottom, or breasts) or sex?
- A student showed, sent, or gave another student pictures or messages related to nakedness or sex?
Responses
Items used a 4 point Likert-type response scale, 1 = never, 2 = once, 3 = a few times, and 4 = several times
Scoring
Not Reported
Citations
Valik, A., Holmqvist Gattario, K., Lunde, C., & Skoog, T. (2023). PSH‐C: A measure of peer sexual harassment among children. Journal of Social Issues, 79(4), 1123-1146. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12517
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Green: Face validity
- Unknown: Convergent validity
- Green: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available