Partner Violence Behaviours (Flisher et al., 2007)

Attitudes, Intentions, Norms, and Expectations about partner violence in middle and late adolescents; 19 Items / 1-7 Item Subscales, Age M = 15.4
  • Populations: Middle and Late Adolescents
  • Age ranges: M = 15.4
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: South Africa

Items

Subscales

  • Perpetration of Partner Violence, 1 Item
  • Intention for Partner Violence, 1 Item
  • Attitudes Towards Partner Violence, 7 Items
  • Subjective Peer Norms Towards Partner Violence, 2 Items
  • General Social Norms Towards Partner Violence, 5 Items
  • Outcome Expectancy when Partner Violence Occurs, 2 Items
  • Self-Efficacy Regarding the Prevention of Partner Violence, 1 Item

 

Example items:

  • Have you ever hit, kicked, slapped or punched your boyfriend (if you are female) or girlfriend (if you are male)?
  • Do you think you would hit, kick, slap or punch your boyfriend (if you are female) or girlfriend (if you are male) if he/she makes you
    cross?

Scoring

“All items were scored so that responses positively associated with partner violence were coded as higher numbers, while responses against partner violence were coded as lower numbers.” (Flisher et al., 2007)

Citations

Flisher, A. J., Myer, L., Mèrais, A., Lombard, C., & Reddy, P. (2007). Prevalence and correlates of partner violence among south african adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(6), 619-627. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01711.x

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Unknown: Face validity
  • Unknown: Convergent validity
  • Unknown: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Red: Internal consistency
  • Red: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading