Parental Attitudes of Gender Expansiveness Scale for Youth (Hidalgo et al., 2017)
- Populations: Adolescent and young adult outpatients of interdisciplinary gender-health clinics
- Age ranges: 12-24 years
- Languages: English
- Countries: United States
Items
Subscales:
- Perceived parental nonaffirmation
- Perceived parental acceptance
Item numbers followed by R are reverse coded
- My parent(s) are proud of me
- R My parent(s) are ashamed of me
- R My parent(s) try to hide me
- I can be myself around my parent(s)
- My parent(s) advocate for my rights as a gender-expansive/trans* child
- My parent(s) protect me and defend me against others prejudice against gender-expansive/trans* people
- R My parent(s) have problems with my gender expression
- R My parent(s) use rewards or treats to pressure me to live as my sex assigned at birth
- I can talk to my parent(s) about romantic relationships and dating
- R My parent(s) worry about how my gender identity will affect our family’s image
- R My parent(s) probably believe they are bad parent(s) because I am gender-expansive/trans*
- R My parent(s) probably believe that I am gender-expansive/trans* because of something they did wrong
- My parent(s) are supportive of my gender transition
- R My parent(s) are worried that my gender identity is a bad influence on other kids in my family
Responses:
Items used a 5 point Likert-type scale ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree,”
Scoring
“Using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from ‘‘strongly disagree’’ to ‘‘strongly agree,’’ .... Values of 1–5 were assigned to each item, such that a higher score was indicative of greater parental support.” (Hidalgo et al., 2017)
Citations
Hidalgo, M. A., Chen, D., Garofalo, R., & Forbes, C. (2017). Perceived Parental Attitudes of Gender Expansiveness: Development and Preliminary Factor Structure of a Self-Report Youth Questionnaire. Transgender Health, 2(1), 180–187. https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2017.0036
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Green: Face validity
- Green: Convergent validity
- Green: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available