Parental Attitudes of Gender Expansiveness Scale for Youth (Hidalgo et al., 2017)

Perceived parental support related to adolescent gender-expansive experiences in adolescents and young adults. 14 Items, Ages 12-24
  • Populations: Adolescent and young adult outpatients of interdisciplinary gender-health clinics
  • Age ranges: 12-24 years
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: United States

Items

Subscales:

  • Perceived parental nonaffirmation
  • Perceived parental acceptance

 

Item numbers followed by R are reverse coded

  • My parent(s) are proud of me 
  • R My parent(s) are ashamed of me 
  • R My parent(s) try to hide me 
  • I can be myself around my parent(s) 
  • My parent(s) advocate for my rights as a gender-expansive/trans* child
  • My parent(s) protect me and defend me against others prejudice against gender-expansive/trans* people
  • R My parent(s) have problems with my gender expression
  • R My parent(s) use rewards or treats to pressure me to live as my sex assigned at birth
  • I can talk to my parent(s) about romantic relationships and dating
  • R My parent(s) worry about how my gender identity will affect our family’s image
  • R My parent(s) probably believe they are bad parent(s) because I am gender-expansive/trans*
  • R My parent(s) probably believe that I am gender-expansive/trans* because of something they did wrong
  • My parent(s) are supportive of my gender transition 
  • R My parent(s) are worried that my gender identity is a bad influence on other kids in my family

 

Responses:

Items used a 5 point Likert-type scale ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree,”

Scoring

“Using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from ‘‘strongly disagree’’ to ‘‘strongly agree,’’ .... Values of 1–5 were assigned to each item, such that a higher score was indicative of greater parental support.” (Hidalgo et al., 2017) 

Citations

Hidalgo, M. A., Chen, D., Garofalo, R., & Forbes, C. (2017). Perceived Parental Attitudes of Gender Expansiveness: Development and Preliminary Factor Structure of a Self-Report Youth Questionnaire. Transgender Health, 2(1), 180–187. https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2017.0036

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Green: Face validity
  • Green: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading