Oral Contraceptive Perception Scale (Hanna, 1994)

Perceptions of oral contraceptive use in adolescent and young adult women; 24 Items, 3-5 Item subscales, Ages 14-25
  • Populations: Adolescents, Young Adults
  • Age ranges: 14-25
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: United States

Items

Subscales

  • Relationship-Oriented Benefits, 5 Items
  • Relationship-Oriented Barriers, 5 Items
  • Adherence Barriers, 4 Items
  • Pregnancy Prevention Benefits for Self, 4 Items
  • Pregnancy Prevention Benefits for Others, 3 Items
  • Benefits of Responsibility, 3 Items

 

Items Not reported, item descriptions taken from factor loading table (Hanna, 1997)

  • Mother know I’m grown-up
  • Father know I’m responsible
  • Father know I’m grown-up
  • Mother know I’m responsible
  • Boyfriend know I’m grown-up
  • Worry about hiding from mother
  • Worry about hiding from father
  • Mother would disapprove
  • Father would disapprove
  • Others think I’m a bad person
  • Easy to forget to make appointment
  • Hard to get appointment
  • Easy to forget appointment
  • Easy to forget to take pill everyday
  • Prevent pregnancy:
    • So able to go to college
    • So stay in high school
    • Until marriage
    • So time to think about self
  • Prevent Pregnancy:
    • So not to hurt mother
    • So not to hurt boyfriend
    • So not to hurt father
  • I’m responsible for taking pills
  • I’m responsible for keeping appointments
  • Boyfriend know I’m responsible

 

Responses

Items used a 5 point Likert-type scale, 1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree

Scoring

Total Score indicated positive regard for oral contraceptives. 

Citations

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Green: Face validity
  • Unknown: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Green: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading