Multidimensional Online Grooming Questionnaire (Gámez-Guadix et al., 2021)

Strategies employed by predatory individuals to groom minors for sexual abuse as experienced by children and adolescents; 20 Items / 4 Item subscales, ages 12-15
  • Populations: Children, Adolescents
  • Age ranges: 12-15
  • Countries: Spain

Items

Subscales:

  • Use of Deception
  • Gift Giving
  • Interest in the Victim’s Environment
  • Sexualization
  • Aggression

 

Items by Subscale:

Use of Deception

  • Lied to make me believe that he/she was a person closer to my age [by appearance, language, etc.]
  • Told me that he/she was younger than he/she really was
  • Lied to make me believe that we had things in common or that we liked the same things
  • Pretended to be other people to convince me of things or scare me

Gift Giving

  • Offered me free photo sessions
  • Offered me work because of my physical appearance (as a model, public relations, etc.)
  • Offered me money or other things in exchange for sex
  • Offered me money or other things in exchange for photos or videos of me

Interest in the Victim’s Environment

  • Showed interest in my school hours, family, etc.
  • Asked me about my family and friends
  • Was interested in my family problems
  • Was interested in how I feel, if I was happy

Sexualization

  •  In the beginning, he/she didn’t talk to me about sex, but then he/she did
  • Made sexual jokes or comments about me
  • Asked me about my sexual experiences
  • From the beginning, showed me his/her interest in sex

Aggression

  • Sent me threatening or insulting messages
  • Threatened to spread or post intimate or sexual photos or videos of me on the Internet 
  • Spread jokes, rumors, gossip, or comments that humiliated me
  • Made me look bad with my family, friends or people I know

 

Responses:

 0 (never), 1 (once or twice), 2 (3–4 times), and 3 (5 or more times).

Scoring

Not Reported

Citations

Gámez-Guadix, M., De Santisteban, P., Wachs, S., & Wright, M. (2021). Unraveling cyber sexual abuse of minors: Psychometrics properties of the Multidimensional Online Grooming Questionnaire and prevalence by sex and age. Child Abuse & Neglect, 120, 105250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105250

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Green: Face validity
  • Green: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading