Life Event Scale (Newcomb, Huba, & Bentler, 1986)

Life events related to health outcomes in adolescents; 34 Items / 3-7 Item subscales, Ages 12-18
  • Populations: Children, Adolescents
  • Age ranges: 12-18
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: United States

Items

Subscales

  • Sexual Events, 7 Items
  • Family and Parent Events, 6 Items
  • Accident and Illness events, 4 Items
  • Relocation Events, 3 Items
  • Autonomy Events, 8 Items
  • Deviance Events, 3 Items
  • Distresful Events, 6 Items

Items by Subscale:

Sexual Events

  • fell in love
  • got or made pregnant
  • got or gave venereal disease
  • started dating regularly
  • broke up with boy/girl friend
  • had a gay experience
  • lost virginity

Items taken from a summary table and may not represent the items as utilized with participants

 

Responses

Item responses not reported

Scoring

Responses were summed to create subscale scores.

Citations

  • Newcomb, M. D., Huba, G. J., & Bentler, P. M. (1981). A multidimensional assessment of stressful life events among adolescents: Derivation and correlates. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22(4), 400. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136681
  • Newcomb, M. D., Huba, G. J., & Bentler, P. M.(1986). Life change events among adolescents: An empirical consideration of some methodological issues. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174(5), 280-289. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-198605000-00004

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Unknown: Face validity
  • Green: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Red: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading