LGBT People of Color Microaggressions Scale (Balsam et al., 2011)
- Populations: Sexual and Racial minority adolescents
- Age ranges: 13-17
- Languages: English
- Countries: United States
Items
Subscales
- LGBTQ+ Racism, 6 Items
- POC Heterosexism, 6 Items
- LGBTQ+ Relationship Racism, 6 Items
Items by Subscale
LGBTQ+ Racism
- Not being able to trust White LGBT people
- Feeling misunderstood by White LGBT people
- Having to educate White LGBT people about race issues
- Being the token LGBT person of color in groups or organizations
- Being told that “race isn’t important” by White LGBT people
- White LGBT people saying things that are racist
POC Heterosexism
- Not being accepted by other people of your race-ethnicity because you are LGBT
- Feeling misunderstood by people in your ethnic/racial community
- Feeling invisible because you are LGBT
- Difficulty findings friends who are LGBT and from your racial-ethnic background
- Feeling unwelcome at groups or events in your racial-ethnic community
- Not having any LGBT people of color as positive role models
LGBTQ+ Relationship Racism
- Being rejected by other LGBT people of your same race-ethnicity
- Being rejected by potential dating or sexual partners because of your race-ethnicity
- Being seen as a sex object by other LGBT people because of your race-ethnicity
- Reading personal ads that say “White people only”
- Feeling like White LGBT people are only interested in you for your appearance
- Being discriminated against by other LGBT people because of your race
Note: LGBTQ+ Racism refers to the “Racism in LGBTQ+ communities” subscale; POC Heterosexism refers to the “Heterosexism in racial-ethnic minority communities” subscale; and LGBTQ+ Relationship Racism refers to the “Racism in dating and close relationships” subscale.
As presented by Caba et al., 2024
Scoring
“Following scoring instructions by Balsam et al. (2011) in the measurement validation paper, responses of 0 were recoded and combined with responses of 1, resulting in a range of 1–4 that referred to the level of distress experienced.”
Citations
- Balsam, K. F., Molina, Y., Beadnell, B., Simoni, J., & Walters, K. (2011). Measuring multiple minority stress: The LGBT people of color micro-aggressions scale. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 17(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023244
- Caba, A. E., Christophe, N. K., Renley, B. M., Simon, K. A., Feinstein, B. A., Eaton, L. A., & Watson, R. J. (2024). Measurement invariance of
the LGBT People of Color Microaggressions Scale among LGBTQ+ youth. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 34, 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12937
Team comments
This measure was originally validated by Balsam and colleagues (2011) in an adult sample. As the Good Measure project is focused on adolescents, all measurement data and evaluations reported here are based on the work of Caba and colleagues (2024), who validated this measure in adolescents.
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Unknown: Face validity
- Unknown: Convergent validity
- Green: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available