Justificiation of Verbal/Coercive Tactics Scale (Slep et al., 2001)

Judgements / justifications of psychological violence behaviours in adolescents and young adults; 24 items / , Ages 16-20
  • Populations: Adolescents, Young Adults
  • Age ranges: 16-20
  • Languages: Spanish
  • Countries: Spain; United States

Items

Subscales

  • Verbal aggression, Male
  • Dominant behavior, Male
  • Jealous Tactics, Male
  • Verbal aggression, Female
  • Dominant behavior, Female
  • Jealous Tactics, Female

Item Stem: “How justified are each of these things?”*

Male Items

  • Insulting or swearing at boyfriend
  • Sulking or refusing to talk about issues with him
  • Stomping out of the room or house
  • Doing or saying something to spite him
  • Keeping him from seeing or talking to his family
  • Turning his family and friends against him
  • Keeping him from doing things to help himself
  • Interfering in his relationship with family members
  • Being jealous and suspicious of his friends
  • Being jealous of other girls
  • Checking up of him/her, making him say where he has been
  • Accusing him of seeing another girl

Female Items

  • Insulting or swearing at girlfriend
  • Sulking or refusing to talk about issues with her
  • Stomping out of the room or house
  • Doing or saying something to spite her
  • Keeping her from seeing or talking to her family
  • Turning her family and friends against her
  • Keeping her from doing things to help herself
  • Interfering in her relationship with family members
  • Being jealous and suspicious of her friends
  • Being jealous of other boys
  • Checking up of her, making him/her say where she has been
  • Accusing her of seeing another boy

 

Responses

Items ask participants if tactics are justified in “many,” “some,” “few,” “extreme,” or ”no” situations.

Scoring

Not Reported

Citations

  • Slep, A. M. S., Cascardi, M., Avery-Leaf, S., & O’Leary, K. D. (2001). Two new measures of attitudes about the acceptability of teen dating aggression. Psychological Assessment, 13(3), 306-318. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.13.3.306
  • Muñoz-Rivas, M. J., Gámez-Guadix, M., Fernández-González, L., & Lozano, M. P. G. (2011). Validation of the attitudes about aggression in dating situations (AADS) and the justification of Verbal/Coercive tactics scale (JVCT) in spanish adolescents. Journal of Family Violence, 26(8), 575-584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-011-9391-3

Team comments

This measure was validated alongside Attitudes about Aggression in Dating Situations (Slep et al., 2001)

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Green: Face validity
  • Green: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Green: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading