Inventory of Anal Sex Knowledge (Kutner et al., 2021)
- Populations: Adolescent Males
- Age ranges: Range not reported, Sample age M (sd) = 15.96 (.85)
- Languages: English
- Countries: United States
Items
- Douches and enemas should use only warm water.
- A fiber-rich diet naturally clears poop from the rectum.
- The rectum makes enough lubrication for anal penetration.*
- The internal anal sphincter relaxes open more easily than the external anal sphincter.*
- The prostate can be felt two inches inside the rectum, by pressing toward the belly button.
- Pressure on the prostate is pleasurable.
- Rubbing inside the rectum massages the internal base of the penis.
- The only way to tell if a guy enjoys anal stimulation is if his penis is erect.*
- During anal stimulation, the natural feeling of having to pee or poop reduces with relaxation.
- It is possible to have anal sex with zero physical discomfort.
Responses:
Response categories for each item were “True” (1), “False” (0), “I don’t know” (2).
Scoring
*Items 3, 4, and 8 were reverse-scored so that a 1 on the item reflected the correct answer. Item responses of “Don’t Know” were re-calculated as incorrect responses.
Citations
Kutner, B. A., Perry, N. S., Stout, C., Norcini Pala, A., Paredes, C. D., & Nelson, K. M. (2022). The Inventory of Anal Sex Knowledge (iASK): A New Measure of Sexual Health Knowledge Among Adolescent Sexual Minority Males. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 19(3), 521–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.12.011
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Unknown: Face validity
- Green: Convergent validity
- Green: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available