Intention to Engage in First Sexual Intercourse (Brcar & Dernovšek, 2009)

Predictors of individual intentions to engage in first sexual intercourse in adolescents; 17 Items, Age M = 14.4
  • Populations: Adolescents
  • Age ranges: Range not reported, M = 14.4
  • Countries: Slovenia

Items

Subscales

  • Past Sexual Behavior
  • Belief in Pleasant Outcome of Behavior
  • Evaluation of Pleasant Outcome of Behavior
  • Subjective Norm
  • Perceived Behavioral Control

 

Items by Subscale

 

Past Sexual Behavior

  • Past Sexual Experiences

Belief in Pleasant Outcome of Behavior

  • probability of the memory of the first intimate sexual experience
  • probability of deepened understanding between partners
  • probability of the end of tension before the first sexual intercourse
  • probability of maturity feeling

Evaluation of Pleasant Outcome of Behavior

  • evaluation of the memory of the first intimate sexual experience – good/pleasant
  • evaluation of the deepened understanding between the partners – good/pleasant
  • evaluation of the end of tension before the first sexual intercourse – good/pleasant
  • evaluation of the maturity feeling – good/pleasant

Subjective Norm

  • likelihood of older sibling’s agreement with your decision to engage into the first sexual intercourse
  • likelihood of school teacher’s agreement with your decision to engage into the first sexual intercourse
  • likelihood of friends’ agreement with your decision to engage into the first sexual intercourse
  • likelihood of schoolmate/peers’ agreement with your decision to engage into the first sexual intercourse

Perceived Behavioral Control

  • Would you refuse sex even if this partner was very attractive?
  • Would you refuse sex if all your friends had already had sexual experience?
  • Would you refuse a demand from your partner for sex because you have yet not decided for yourself?
  • Whether I decide to engage in the sexual intercourse or not depends entirely on me,

 

*Items were taken from a model structure diagram and related notes (Brcar & Dernovšek, 2009) for research purposes, and may not accurately represent items as presented in measure application.

 

Responses

Items used a 6 point rating scale  (Brcar & Dernovšek, 2009)

Scoring

Not Reported

Citations

Brcar, P., & Dernovsek, M. Z. (2009). Validation of questionnaire estimating predictors of behavior intention to engage in first sexual intercourse among eighth-grade pupils. Croatian Medical Journal, 50(5), 483-491. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2009.50.483

 

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Unknown: Face validity
  • Green: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading