Homophobic Bullying Scale (Prati, 2012)
- Populations: Adolescents and Young Adults
- Age ranges: 15-22
- Languages: Italian, Spanish
- Countries: Italy; Spain
Items
Subscales:
- Homophobic Aggressive Behavior (bully perspective) 14 Items
- Homophobic Victimization (victim perspective)
- Observation of Homophobic aggressive behavior (witness perspective): 18 items
Items and item counts are [one exception] not reported, introductory statements used in each subscale are:
Homophobic Aggressive Behavior (bully perspective)
- ‘‘Think about a student who is perceived as gay (or lesbian). Because of this, during the past 30 days, how often did you . . .’’
Homophobic Victimization (victim perspective)
- ‘‘During the past 30 days in your school, how often were you [the behavior] by a student, because you are perceived be gay or lesbian?’’
Observation of Homophobic aggressive behavior (witness perspective)
- ‘‘Think about a student who is perceived as gay (or lesbian). Because of this, during the past 30 days, how often did you . . . ?’’
Responses:
Response options include Never (1), 1, 2, or 3 times (2), about once a week (3), more than once a week (4)
Scoring
Not Reported
Citations
- Prati, G. (2012). Development and Psychometric Properties of the Homophobic Bullying Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(4), 649–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412440169
- Orue, I., Calvete, E., Fernández-González, L. (2018). ADAPTACIÓN DE LA “ESCALA DE ACOSO ESCOLAR HOMOFÓBICO” Y MAGNITUD DEL PROBLEMA EN ADOLESCENTES ESPAÑOLES. Behavioral Psychology / Psicología Conductual, 26(3), 437-455.
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Green: Face validity
- Green: Convergent validity
- Green: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Green: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available