Homophobic Bullying Scale (Prati, 2012)

Prevalence of sexuality-related bullying perpetration, victimization, and observantion in Adolescents and Young Adults; Full Item Count not available, Ages 15-22
  • Populations: Adolescents and Young Adults
  • Age ranges: 15-22
  • Languages: Italian, Spanish
  • Countries: Italy; Spain

Items

Subscales:

  • Homophobic Aggressive Behavior (bully perspective) 14 Items
  • Homophobic Victimization (victim perspective)
  • Observation of Homophobic aggressive behavior (witness perspective): 18 items

 

Items and item counts are [one exception] not reported, introductory statements used in each subscale are:

Homophobic Aggressive Behavior (bully perspective)

  • ‘‘Think about a student who is perceived as gay (or lesbian). Because of this, during the past 30 days, how often did you . . .’’ 


Homophobic Victimization (victim perspective)

  • ‘‘During the past 30 days in your school, how often were you [the behavior] by a student, because you are perceived be gay or lesbian?’’


Observation of Homophobic aggressive behavior (witness perspective)

  • ‘‘Think about a student who is perceived as gay (or lesbian). Because of this, during the past 30 days, how often did you . . . ?’’ 

 

Responses:

Response options include Never (1), 1, 2, or 3 times (2), about once a week (3), more than once a week (4)

Scoring

Not Reported

Citations

  • Prati, G. (2012). Development and Psychometric Properties of the Homophobic Bullying Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(4), 649–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412440169
  • Orue, I., Calvete, E., Fernández-González, L. (2018). ADAPTACIÓN DE LA “ESCALA DE ACOSO ESCOLAR HOMOFÓBICO” Y  MAGNITUD DEL PROBLEMA EN ADOLESCENTES ESPAÑOLES. Behavioral Psychology / Psicología Conductual, 26(3), 437-455. 

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Green: Face validity
  • Green: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Green: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading