Homophobia Scale (Dutch Version) (Hooghe, 2008)
- Populations: Belgian adolescent population
- Age ranges: (M = 18)
- Languages: Dutch, French, English
Items
1. Gay people make me nervous
2. I feel that you cannot trust a person who is homosexual
3. I avoid contact with homosexual individuals
4. Homosexuality is acceptable to me (recoded)
5. Marriage between homosexual individuals is acceptable
(recoded)
6. It does not matter to me whether my friends are gay or straight
(recoded)
7. Organizations that promote rights of gay people are necessary
(recoded)
Scoring
The scale proved to be one-dimensional both for boys (Cronbach’s a: .90) and for girls (Cronbach’s a: .88). This level of internal consistency is remarkable for a balanced attitudinal scale, with three positive and four negative item formulations. Therefore, we can conclude that this shortened Homophobia scale offers a valid operationalization of the attitudinal component of homophobia in a mass survey (Table 1). The scale (range: 0 100) resulted in an average score of 37.89
Citations
Hooghe, M. (2011). The Impact of Gendered Friendship Patterns on the Prevalence of Homophobia Among Belgian Late Adolescents. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(3), 543–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9635-y
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Unknown: Face validity
- Unknown: Convergent validity
- Green: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available