Homonegativity Scale (Morrison, Parriag, & Morrison, 1999)
- Populations: adolescents
- Age ranges: M = 16.5, SD = 2.3 years, range not reported
- Languages: English
- Countries: Canada
Items
Item Stem: I believe that:
- 1. homosexuals should not be allowed to work with children.
- 2. homosexuality is not a mental disorder.*
- 3. homosexuals should have the same rights as heterosexuals.*
- 4. homosexuals are immoral.
- 5. people who support homosexual rights are probably homosexual themselves
- 6. homosexuals should be avoided whenever possible.
*Item is reverse-coded
Responses
Items used a 5 point Likert-type scale, 1 = strongly disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = don’t know; 4 = agree; 5 = strongly agree.
Scoring
“Scores can range from 6 to 30, with higher scores representing greater homonegativity.” (Morrison, Parriag, & Morrison, 1999)
Citations
Morrison, T.G., McLeod, L.D., Morrison, M.A., Anderson, D., & O’Connor, W.E. (1997). Gender stereotyping, homonegativity, and misconceptions about sexually coercive behaviour among adolescents. Youth & Society, 28, 351-382
Todd G.MorrisonPhD, Amanda V.ParriagPhD (cand.) & Melanie A.MorrisonPhD (cand.) (1999) The Psychometric Properties of the Homonegativity Scale, Journal of Homosexuality, 37:4, 111-126, DOI: 10.1300/J082v37n04_07
Team comments
This scale has two versions: HS-G intended for use with gay men, and the HS-L intended for use with lesbians.
This scale is a subscale of the Sexual Aggressions and Conservatism Scale (Morrison et al., 1997)
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Unknown: Face validity
- Green: Convergent validity
- Green: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available