HIV/STD Risk Screening Index for Adolescents (Jarama et al., 2011)
- Populations: American adolescents at heightened risk for contracting HIV/STDs
- Age ranges: 12-19 years
- Languages: English
- Countries: United States
Items
Subscales:
- Initiation of sex
- Risky sexual behavior
- Substance use and sex
- Condom use
All items:
- Have you ever had sexual intercourse?
- Are you waiting to have sex until you are older?
- Have you ever had any kind of sexual contact with another person?
- Did you have sexual intercourse before your 15th birthday?
- Have you ever been forced or pressured into having sex when you did not want to?
- Have you ever been high on drugs or alcohol when you had sex with someone?
- Have you had sex with two or more people in hte past 3 months?
- Have you ever had anal intercourse (sex in your butt)?
- Have you ever had sex to get money, food, drugs, or a place to stay?
- Do you find it difficult to use condoms every time you have sex?
- Have you ever been sexually involved with someone who is more than 5 years older than you?
- Hafve you ever had sex with someone who has sex with both males and females?
- Have any of your closest friends started having sex?
- Have you been or gotten someone pregnant?
- Have you ever thought you or your partner might be pregnant?
- Have you been drunk in the past two weeks?
- During the last two weeks, have you used any drugs other than alcohol to get high?
- Have you ever had sexual intercourse without using a condom?
Response options not reported
Scoring
Responses were categorized into ‘‘risky’’ and ‘‘not risky’’ in terms of becoming infected with HIV=STDs and summed to obtain a total score
Citations
S. LisbethJaramaPhD, Natalie A.StultzMS, Kathleen M.ParilloMA, FrederickR.SnyderPhD (ABD) & Paul A.YoungMBA, MPH (2011) Development of an HIV/STD Screening Index to Measure HIV/STD Risk in Adolescents, Journal of HIV/AIDS & Social Services, 10:3, 230-247, DOI: 10.1080/15381501.2011.596766
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Green: Face validity
- Green: Convergent validity
- Green: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Green: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available