HIV/STD Risk Screening Index for Adolescents (Jarama et al., 2011)

Screens adolescents at risk for HIV and other STDs. 18 items, 4 subscales Age 12-19
  • Populations: American adolescents at heightened risk for contracting HIV/STDs
  • Age ranges: 12-19 years
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: United States

Items

Subscales:

  • Initiation of sex
  • Risky sexual behavior
  • Substance use and sex
  • Condom use

 

All items:

  • Have you ever had sexual intercourse?
  • Are you waiting to have sex until you are older?
  • Have you ever had any kind of sexual contact with another person?
  • Did you have sexual intercourse before your 15th birthday?
  • Have you ever been forced or pressured into having sex when you did not want to?
  • Have you ever been high on drugs or alcohol when you had sex with someone?
  • Have you had sex with two or more people in hte past 3 months?
  • Have you ever had anal intercourse (sex in your butt)?
  • Have you ever had sex to get money, food, drugs, or a place to stay?
  • Do you find it difficult to use condoms every time you have sex?
  • Have you ever been sexually involved with someone who is more than 5 years older than you?
  • Hafve you ever had sex with someone who has sex with both males and females?
  • Have any of your closest friends started having sex?
  • Have you been or gotten someone pregnant?
  • Have you ever thought you or your partner might be pregnant?
  • Have you been drunk in the past two weeks?
  • During the last two weeks, have you used any drugs other than alcohol to get high?
  • Have you ever had sexual intercourse without using a condom?

 

Response options not reported

Scoring

Responses were categorized into ‘‘risky’’ and ‘‘not risky’’ in terms of becoming infected with HIV=STDs and summed to obtain a total score

 

Citations

S. LisbethJaramaPhD, Natalie A.StultzMS, Kathleen M.ParilloMA, FrederickR.SnyderPhD (ABD) & Paul A.YoungMBA, MPH (2011) Development of an HIV/STD Screening Index to Measure HIV/STD Risk in Adolescents, Journal of HIV/AIDS & Social Services, 10:3, 230-247, DOI: 10.1080/15381501.2011.596766

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Green: Face validity
  • Green: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Green: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading