HIV and Other STIs Knowledge Scale (Espada et al., 2014)
- Populations: Colombian adolescent population
- Age ranges: 14-19 years
- Languages: Colombian Spanish, Spanish
- Countries: Colombia; Spain
Items
Subscales
- Fear of Negative Evaluation - Dating (10 items)
- Social Distress - Dating (7 items)
- Social Distress - Group (4 Items
Taken from (Espada et al., 2013), presented in English and in reported order. Authors note in presenting these items that items with factor loadings <.40 were excluded.
- If my partner would ask me to have unprotected sex I would refuse it.
- If my partner would want to have sex without a condom, I would try to convince her/him to use it
- If I were going to have sex and realize that I have no condoms, I would wait until I have them to maintain sexual intercourse.
- I would be willing to be tested for AIDS if I had had a risk behavior.
- I would recommend a friend to get tested for HIV if he/she had had sexual risk behaviors.
- I would be willing to say that I agree with the use of condoms in front of my group of friends.
- I would be willing to publicly defend the use of condoms.
- I would be willing to carry condoms for my use.
- I would be willing to use condoms in a sexual relationship.
- If a friend became infected with HIV, I would probably distance myself from him.
- I would be uncomfortable with someone with AIDS attending to my class.
- I would be willing to kiss on the cheek to an HIV positive person.
Item Responses:
Items have False, True, or I do not know, as response options. For statistic treatment, items are recoded into “Known or do not know”
Scoring
None reported
Citations
Abello-Luque, Daniella et al. “Colombian Adaptation of the HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections Knowledge Scale (KSI) in an Adolescent Population.” Evaluation & the health professions vol. 44,2 (2021): 161-167. doi:10.1177/0163278720979621
Espada, J., Guille´n-Riquelme, A., Morales, A., Orgile´s, M., & Sierra, J. (2014). Validation of a knowledge scale on HIV and other sexually transmitted infections in the adolescent population. Primary Care, 46(10), 558–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2014.03.007
Team comments
Discrepancy in SD of sample age: reported as 1.36 in abstract and 1.30 in results section (Abello-Luque, Daniella et al., 2021)
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Green: Face validity
- Green: Convergent validity
- Green: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Green: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available