Gender Questionaire (Hines et al., 2003)
- Populations: Individuals living with atypical sex development.
- Age ranges: 6-41
- Countries: Indonesia
Items
Subscales
- Gender identity and gender role behavior, 4 Items
- Cross-Gender identity and cross-gender role behavior, 10 Items
Items by Subscale
Gender Identity and Gender Role Behavior
- During the past 12 months, my behavior has been what most people consider appropriate for my sex
- During my lifetime, my behavior has been what most people consider appropriate for my sex
- During the past 12 months, I enjoyed being a person of my sex
- During my lifetime, I enjoyed being a person of my sex
Cross-Gender identity and cross-gender role behavior
- During the past 12 months, I have wished I were a person of the opposite sex
- During my lifetime, I have wished I were a person of the opposite sex
- During the past 12 months, I have thought I was psychologically a person of the opposite sex
- During my lifetime, I have thought I was psychologically a person of the opposite sex
- During the past 12 months, I have been treated as person of the opposite sex by people who knew me well and people who were unfamiliar to me
- During my lifetime, I have been treated as person of the opposite sex by people who knew me well and people who were unfamiliar to me
- During the past 12 months, I have presented myself as person of the opposite sex at my job and during leisure time
- During my lifetime, I have presented myself as person of the opposite sex at my job and during leisure time
- During the past 12 months, I wanted medical treatment to change my body into a body of the opposite sex
- During my lifetime, I wanted medical treatment to change my body into a body of the opposite sex
Scoring
“The results were summarized in two sum scores for gender identity and gender role behavior: in the past 12 months and during the entire lifetime (range sum score: 2–14 for each period) and two sum scores for cross-gender identity and cross-gender role behavior: in the past 12 months and during the entire lifetime (range sum score: 5–35 for each period). Low scores on gender identity and gender role behavior (Factor1) indicate a distinct sex-typical gender identity and gender role behavior in the specified periods. Higher scores on cross-gender identity and cross-gender role behavior (Factor 2) indicate a cross-gender identity and more cross-gender role behaviors.” (Ediati et al., 2015)
Citations
- Hines, M., Ahmed, S., & Hughes, I. (2003). Psychological outcomes and gender-related development in complete androgen insensitivity syndrome. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32(2), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022492106974
- Ediati, A., Juniarto, A. Z., Birnie, E., Drop, S. L. S., Faradz, S. M. H., & Dessens, A. B. (2015). Gender development in indonesian children, adolescents, and adults with disorders of sex development. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(5), 1339-1361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0493-5
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Green: Face validity
- Unknown: Convergent validity
- Green: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available