Female Adolescent Sexuality Stress and Support Scale (Bedard-Thomas et al., 2019)

Sexuality-related stress, stressors, and social support experiences in adolescent females, including sexual minority females. 26 Items / 3-8 Item Subscales, Ages 12-21 (M = 17.1)
  • Populations: Individuals identifying as women
  • Age ranges: 12-21
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: United States

Items

Subscales:

  • Fear of disclosure and judgement
  • sexuality-related bullying
  • family support
  • friend support
  • dating comfort
  • gender identity confidence

 

Fear of Disclosure & Judgment 

  • If adults at school knew about my sexual attraction, identity, or behavior I would get into trouble
  • I am scared of people knowing my sexuality at school
  • I am comfortable choosing a label/s to identify my sexual feelings, attractions, and behaviors (like straight, lesbian, bisexual, unsure, queer)*
  • People at school judge me because of my sexuality
  • Rumors and gossip at school prevent me from sharing my sexuality and dating experiences
  • I am frightened to tell my family about my sexuality
  • When it comes to dating, relationships, and sexuality, I feel judged by my family
  • My family would be very upset if they knew about my sexuality

 

Sexuality-Related Bullying 

  • Physical bullying because of sexuality (or perceived sexuality) is common at my school (e.g., hitting, kicking, spitting, pushing)
  • Verbal bullying because of sexuality (or perceived sexuality) is common at my school (e.g., name calling, taunting, spreading rumors, excluding)
  • I am bullied (verbally or physically) at school because of my sexuality or perceived sexuality
  • I witness other kids at school being bullied (verbally or physically) because of their sexuality or perceived sexuality

 

Family Support 

  • There is someone in my family that I can talk openly with about my experiences with dating, relationships, and sexuality
  • My family knows about my dating, relationships, and sexuality
  • I feel comfortable being open with my family about my dating, relationships, and sexuality
  • It is challenging to have open conversations with my family about dating, relationships, and sexuality*
  • My family is proud of me, regardless of my sexuality

 

Friend Support

  • There are people in my life (friends, family, teachers) that I can talk to when I havequestions about dating, relationships, and sexuality
  • I am comfortable talking about my sexuality with my friends
  • My friends have supported me through my experiences with dating, relationships,and sexuality

 

Dating Comfort 

  • Dating has made me confident that I know what I want and how I should be treated
  • I don’t know what to think about dating or sexuality because of mixed messages from the different parts of my life (e.g., home, church, school, TV)*
  • I can date whomever I want without being judged by others in my own racial/ethnic group

 

Gender Identity Confidence 

  • I like being a girl
  • It is easier to be a girl than it is to be a boy
  • There is power that comes with being a girl

 

Responses:

Participants responded using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all true for me) to 5 (totally true for me)

Scoring

“Note: * = Reverse scored items; Participants responded using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all true for me) to 5 (totally true for me); Communalities ranged from .36 to .83 after rotation, accounting for 64% of the variance; Retention of 6 factors was supported by a Monte Carlo parallel analysis. Average mean inter-item correlations are reported as a measure of internal consistency because each subscale is comprised of less than 10 items (Pallant, 2013). Average inter-item correlations typically range between .15 and .50 (Clark & Watson, 1995)” (Bedard-Thomas et al., 2019)

Citations

Katherine K. Bedard-Thomas, John L. McKenna, David W. Pantalone, Gary Fireman & Amy K. Marks (2019) A mixed-methods measurement study of female adolescent sexuality stress and support, Psychology & Sexuality, 10:3, 212-233, DOI: 10.1080/19419899.2019.1596972

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Green: Face validity
  • Green: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Unknown: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading