Electronic Behavior of Adolescents in Relationships (Johnson, 2017)

Presentation of electronic abuse behaviours for both perpetrators and victims in adolescents; 32 Items / 16 Item Subscales; Ages 13-18
  • Populations: Adolescents
  • Age ranges: 13-18
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: United States

Items

Subscales

  • Victimization: 16 Items
    • Threatening / Coercive Behaviors
    • Monitoring
  • Perpetration: 16 Items
    • Threatening / Coercive Behaviors
    • Monitoring

Items by Subscale

Victimization

Item Stem: In the past year using technology, how often has your current or recent dating partner:

  • Posted a comment or status on social media to show that they care about you?
  • Logged into your social media or Internet account without your permission (to see who you were talking to or change your profile like deleting friends/followers)?
  • Posted a comment or status on social media to hurt, embarrass, or get back you (for example, a sub/ subliminal message)?
  • Called or sent you messages repeatedly (for example, blowing up your phone, trying to find out where you are or who you are with)?
  • Pressured you to send a sexual message, picture or video (sext)? 
  • Threatened to hurt you in a message, phone call, or on social media?
  • Told you who you can and can’t be friends with or talk to social media? 
  • Posted a happy picture of you on social media for others to see? 
  • Used technology to know where you were or if you were active on social media (for example, location tracking, GPS apps)?
  • Threatened to share a personal or embarrassing photo or video of you without permission (for example, threats to blackmail or expose you through social media, group text)?
  • Looked through your phone to see your calls, texts, social media messages (such as DMs, chats), or photos?
  • Threatened you if you did not send a sexual picture or message? 
  • Sent sexual photo or video of you to others without permission? 
  • Pressured or insisted that you give them your passwords so they could access your phone or other online accounts?
  • Sent a sexual picture, video or text when you didn’t want it? 
  • Pressured you to respond quickly to their calls, texts, or other messages?

Perpetration

Item Stem: In the past year using technology, how often have you:

  • Posted a comment or status on social media to show that you care about your partner? 
  • Logged into their social media or other Internet account without your partner’s permission (to see who they were talking to or change their profile like deleting friends/followers)?
  • Sent your partner a message to tell you were thinking about you? 
  • Called or sent your partner messages repeatedly (for example, blowing up their phone, trying to find out where they are or who they’re with)?
  • Pressured your partner to send a sexual message, picture or video (sext)?
  • Threatened to hurt your partner in a message, phone call, or on social media?
  • Told your partner who they can and can’t be friends with or talk to social media? 
  • Posted a happy picture of them on social media for others to see? 
  • Used technology to know where your partner was or if you were active on social media (for example, location tracking, GPS apps)? 
  • Threatened to share a personal or embarrassing photo or video of your partner without permission (for example, threats to blackmail or expose you through social media, group text)?
  • Looked through your partner’s phone to see their calls, texts, social media messages (such as DMs, chats), or photos?
  • Threatened your partner if they did not send a sexual picture or message? 
  • Sent a sexual photo or video of your partner to others without permission? 
  • Pressured or insisted that your partner give you their passwords so you could access their phone or other online accounts? 
  • Sent a sexual picture, video or message when your partner didn’t want it? 
  • Pressured your partner to respond quickly to your calls, texts, or other messages? 

Item stem emphasis retained from Johnson (2017).

Responses

Items used a 4 point Likert-type scale, 0 = Never, 1 = Rarely, 2 = Sometimes, 3 = Often

Scoring

Not Reported

Citations

Johnson, S.E. (2017). Teen Digital Dating Abuse: Development and Validation of a Self-Report Measure [Doctoral Dissertation, Northeastern University]. ProQuest Dissertations

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Unknown: Face validity
  • Green: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading