Electronic Behavior of Adolescents in Relationships (Johnson, 2017)
- Populations: Adolescents
- Age ranges: 13-18
- Languages: English
- Countries: United States
Items
Subscales
- Victimization: 16 Items
- Threatening / Coercive Behaviors
- Monitoring
- Perpetration: 16 Items
- Threatening / Coercive Behaviors
- Monitoring
Items by Subscale
Victimization
Item Stem: In the past year using technology, how often has your current or recent dating partner:
- Posted a comment or status on social media to show that they care about you?
- Logged into your social media or Internet account without your permission (to see who you were talking to or change your profile like deleting friends/followers)?
- Posted a comment or status on social media to hurt, embarrass, or get back you (for example, a sub/ subliminal message)?
- Called or sent you messages repeatedly (for example, blowing up your phone, trying to find out where you are or who you are with)?
- Pressured you to send a sexual message, picture or video (sext)?
- Threatened to hurt you in a message, phone call, or on social media?
- Told you who you can and can’t be friends with or talk to social media?
- Posted a happy picture of you on social media for others to see?
- Used technology to know where you were or if you were active on social media (for example, location tracking, GPS apps)?
- Threatened to share a personal or embarrassing photo or video of you without permission (for example, threats to blackmail or expose you through social media, group text)?
- Looked through your phone to see your calls, texts, social media messages (such as DMs, chats), or photos?
- Threatened you if you did not send a sexual picture or message?
- Sent sexual photo or video of you to others without permission?
- Pressured or insisted that you give them your passwords so they could access your phone or other online accounts?
- Sent a sexual picture, video or text when you didn’t want it?
- Pressured you to respond quickly to their calls, texts, or other messages?
Perpetration
Item Stem: In the past year using technology, how often have you:
- Posted a comment or status on social media to show that you care about your partner?
- Logged into their social media or other Internet account without your partner’s permission (to see who they were talking to or change their profile like deleting friends/followers)?
- Sent your partner a message to tell you were thinking about you?
- Called or sent your partner messages repeatedly (for example, blowing up their phone, trying to find out where they are or who they’re with)?
- Pressured your partner to send a sexual message, picture or video (sext)?
- Threatened to hurt your partner in a message, phone call, or on social media?
- Told your partner who they can and can’t be friends with or talk to social media?
- Posted a happy picture of them on social media for others to see?
- Used technology to know where your partner was or if you were active on social media (for example, location tracking, GPS apps)?
- Threatened to share a personal or embarrassing photo or video of your partner without permission (for example, threats to blackmail or expose you through social media, group text)?
- Looked through your partner’s phone to see their calls, texts, social media messages (such as DMs, chats), or photos?
- Threatened your partner if they did not send a sexual picture or message?
- Sent a sexual photo or video of your partner to others without permission?
- Pressured or insisted that your partner give you their passwords so you could access their phone or other online accounts?
- Sent a sexual picture, video or message when your partner didn’t want it?
- Pressured your partner to respond quickly to your calls, texts, or other messages?
Item stem emphasis retained from Johnson (2017).
Responses
Items used a 4 point Likert-type scale, 0 = Never, 1 = Rarely, 2 = Sometimes, 3 = Often
Scoring
Not Reported
Citations
Johnson, S.E. (2017). Teen Digital Dating Abuse: Development and Validation of a Self-Report Measure [Doctoral Dissertation, Northeastern University]. ProQuest Dissertations
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Unknown: Face validity
- Green: Convergent validity
- Green: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available