Cyber Dating Violence Scale [Modified] (Teenage Research Unlimited, 2007)

Aggressive actions carried out using online media and telecommunications services against romantic partners in adolescents; 8 Items
  • Populations: American 7th grade students
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: United States

Items

Items as reported in Cutbush & Williams (2016)

Item stem:

“How many times in the last 6 months have you done the following things to a boyfriend or girlfriend using a cell phone, email, IM, text messaging, Web chat, a blog, or a networking site like MySpace or Facebook?”

  • called them names, put them down, or said really mean things to them
  • contacted them when they did not want you to, just to make them mad
  • tried to make them afraid
  • spread rumors about them
  • made them afriad to not respond to you because of what you might do
  • showed private or embarrassing pictures / video of them to others
  • threatened to hurt them physically
  • repeatedly checked up on them to see where they were

 

Responses not reported

 

 

Scoring

“Response options for each of the items within each scale were coded dichotomously: never (0), any (1).” (Cutbush & Williams, 2016)

Citations

Teenage Research Unlimited. (2007) Tech abuse in teen relationships study. Northbook, IL: Teenage Research Unlimited, Inc.

 

Cutbush, S., & Williams, J. (2016). Teen Dating Violence, Sexual Harassment, and Bullying Among Middle School Youth: Examining Measurement Invariance by Gender. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26(4), 918–926. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12244

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Unknown: Face validity
  • Unknown: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Unknown: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading