Cyber Dating Violence Inventory (Morelli et al., 2018)

Victim and/or Perpetrator perspectives of cyber violence targeted at damaging victim's relationships in Adolescents and Young Adults; 11 Items / 6 & 5 Item subscales, 13-22
  • Populations: Adolescents and Young adults
  • Age ranges: 13-22
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: Italy

Items

Please note this scale has two forms: Perpetration and Victimization.  Both item lists are presented below as reported.

Subscales:

  • Psychological Violence: 6 Items
  • Relational Violence: 5 Items

 

Perpetration

  • I wrote things via SMS/mail/Facebook just to make him/her angry
  • I brought up something bad that he/she had done in the past via SMS/mail/Facebook
  • I threatened to end the relationship via SMS/mail/Facebook
  • I accused him/her of flirting with someone else via SMS/mail/Facebook
  • I insulted him/her with put downs via SMS/mail/Facebook
  • I wrote something via SMS/mail/Facebook to make him/her feel jealous
  • I tried to turn his/her friends agianst him/her using SMS/mail/Facebook
  • I spread rumors about him/her via SMS/mail/Facebook
  • I said things to his/her friends about him/her via SMS/mail/Facebook to turn them against him/her
  • I publicly riduculed him/her on Facebook or via SMS/mail
  • I threatened to hurt him/her via SMS/mail/Facebook

 

Victimization

  • He/she wrote things via SMS/mail/Facebook just to make me angry
  • He/she brought up something bad that I had done in the past via SMS/mail/Facebook
  • He/she threatened to end the relationship via SMS/mail/Facebook
  • He/she accused me of flirting with someone else via SMS/mail/Facebook
  • He/she insulted me with put downs via SMS/mail/Facebook
  • He/she wrote something via SMS/mail/Facebook to make me feel jealous
  • He/she tried to turn my friends agianst me using SMS/mail/Facebook
  • He/she spread rumors about me via SMS/mail/Facebook
  • He/she said things to my friends about me via SMS/mail/Facebook to turn them against me
  • He/she threatened to hurt me via SMS/mail/Facebook
  • He/she publicly riduculed me on Facebook or via SMS/mail

 

Responses:

Participants reported the frequency of cyber dating abuse over the last year on a 4-point Likert scale (From 0 = Never to 3 = 6 times or more)

Scoring

Not Reported

Citations

Mara Morelli, Dora Bianchi, Antonio Chirumbolo & Roberto Baiocco (2018) The cyber dating violence inventory. Validation of a new scale for online perpetration and victimization among dating partners, European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15:4, 464-471, DOI: 10.1080/17405629.2017.1305885

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Unknown: Face validity
  • Green: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading