Concealment Stress and Positive Identity Development (Bruce, Harper, & Bauermeister, 2015)

Identity concealment stress and positive identity development in young gay and bisexual men. 14 Items / 6 & 8 Item subscales, Ages 16-24
  • Populations: Individuals assigned male at birth, who have sex with others assigned male at birth.
  • Age ranges: 16-24
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: United States

Items

Subscales:

  • Positive Identity Development
  • Concealment Stress

 

Positive Identity Development Item Stem: “How did you think about the following issues after you began meeting other LGBT persons:” 

  • I felt more comfortable with who I was 
  • I thought there were people I could talk to about my experiences. 
  • I wanted to disprove stereotypes about gay men. 
  • My friends told me that being gay was acceptable. 
  • I got to know people who had similar experiences to me. 
  • I got to know people who were supportive of me

 

Concealment Stress Item Stem: “When you were growing up and realizing you were attracted to other guys sexually…” 

  • How often did you feel like you had to hide your attraction to other guys? 
  • How often did you feel like you couldn’t be yourself? 
  • How often did you feel uncomfortable in your own body? 
  • How often did you feel isolated? 
  • How often did you think you could not act on your feelings? 
  • How often did you question yourself based on what other people said about you? 
  • How often did you fear judgment from your family about your feelings toward other men? 
  • How often did you fear judgment from friends about your feelings toward other men.

Scoring

Not Reported

Citations

Bruce, D., Harper, G. W., & Bauermeister, J. A. (2015). Minority stress, positive identity development, and depressive symptoms: Implications for resilience among sexual minority male youth. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 2(3), 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000128.

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Unknown: Face validity
  • Unknown: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading