Children’s Impact of Traumatic Events Scale - Revised, Attributions Scale (Crouch et al., 1999)

Attributive mediating factors on PTSD presentation in children and adolescents, 30 Items, Ages 8-17
  • Populations: Sexually Abused Youth
  • Age ranges: 8-17
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: United States

Items

Items not reported, no examples given. Item counts and subscales:

CITES-R Attributions Scale: 30 (33 originally, 3 omitted by mistake)

  • Self-Blame / Guilt: 12
  • Personal Vulnerability: 6 (9 Items originally, 3 omitted by mistake)
  • Dangerious World: 5
  • Empowerment: 7 

Scoring

CITES-R Attributions Scale: 

  • Self-Blame / Guilt: - High scores reflect respondent tendency to self-blame for abuse.
  • Personal Vulnerability: High scores reflect respondent beliefs that sexual abuse happens often to children, it could happen to them again, and the victim is unable to prevent bad things happening to them.
  • Dangerous World: High scores reflect respondent tendency to worry about children and believe that adults can’t be trusted.
  • Empowerment: High scores reflect respondent feeling of capacity to prevent sexual abuse recurrence. 

Citations

  • Crouch, J., Smith, D., Ezzell, C., & Saunders, B. (1990). Measuring Reactions to Sexual Trauma Among Children: Comparing the Children’s Impact of Traumatic Events Scale and the Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children. Child Maltreatment, 4(3), 255-263.
  • Wolfe, V. V., Gentile, C., Michienzi, T., Sas, L., & Wolfe, D. A. (1991). Children’s Impact of Traumatic Events Scale: A measure of post-sexual-abuse PTSD symptoms. Behavioral Assessment, 13, 359–383.

Team comments

Developed in a group of 4 measurement instruments:

CITES-R PTSD

CITES-R Social Reactions Scale

CITES-R Attributions Scale

CITES-R Eroticism

(Crouch et al., 1999)

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Unknown: Face validity
  • Green: Convergent validity
  • Unknown: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading