Child Sexual Abuse Myth Scale (Collings et al., 2009)
- Populations: Adolescents and young adults in South Korea, Sweden, and South Africa
- Age ranges: Age range not reported; All Samples M(SD): 16.49 (.50) ; 22.83 (4.64) ; 16.99 (1.25) ; 23.55 (2.27) ; 26.93 (7.48)
- Languages: English, Swedish, Korean
- Countries: South Africa; South Korea; Sweden
Items
Blame Diffusion
- Children who do not report ongoing sexual abuse must want the sexual contact to continue.
- Many children have an unconscious wish to be sexually involved with the opposite sexed parent, which leads them to unconsciously behave in ways that make sexual abuse more likely.
- Adolescent girls who wear very revealing clothing are asking to be sexually abused.
- A woman who does not satisfy her partner sexually must bear some of the responsibility if her partner feels frustrated and turns to her children for sexual satisfaction.
- Children raised by gay or lesbian couples face a greater risk of being sexually abused than children raised by heterosexual couples
Denial of Abusiveness
- Sexual contact between an adult and a child that does not involve force or coercion and that does not involve actual or attempted intercourse is unlikely to have serious consequences for the child.
- Sexual contact with an adult can contribute favourably to a child’s subsequent psychosexual development.
- Children who act in a seductive manner must be seen as being at least partly to blame if an adult responds to them in a sexual way.
- Sexual contact between an adult and a child which is wanted by the child and which is physically pleasurable for the child cannot really be described as abuse.
- Older children, who have a better understanding of sexual matters, have a responsibility to actively resist sexual advances made by adults.
Restrictive Stereotypes
- It is not sexual contact with adults that is harmful for children. What is really damaging for the child is the social stigma that develops after the “secret” is out.
- Child sexual abuse takes place mainly in poor, disorganized, unstable families.
- Child sexual abuse is caused by social problems such as unemployment, poverty and alcohol abuse.
- Most children are sexually abused by strangers or by someone who is not well known to the child.
- Boys are more likely than girls to enjoy sexual contact with adults and are therefore less likely to be emotionally traumatized by the experience.
Scoring
The CSAMS is a 15-item self-report measure of child sexual abuse myth acceptance which is scored using a 5-point scale (1 = strongly disagree,5= strongly agree), with higher scores indi- cating a greater acceptance of abuse related myths and stereo- types. In the South African validation sample, the CSAMS was found to yield three factor scores: Blame Diffusion, Denial of Abusiveness, and Restrictive Stereotypes. Work with the CSAMS indicates reasonable internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = .76), adequate test-retest reliability (.87 at four weeks), and acceptable levels of convergent and discriminant validity (Collings, 1997)
Citations
Steven J. Collings, Lotten Lindblom, Sylvester N. Madu & Myung Sook Park (2009) The Cross-Cultural Validity of the Child Sexual Abuse Myth Scale: A Preliminary Investigation, Journal of Psychology in Africa, 19:1, 9-17, DOI: 10.1080/14330237.2009.10820253
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Unknown: Face validity
- Green: Convergent validity
- Green: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available