Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men Scale (Herek, 1984)
- Populations: young adults
- Age ranges: m = 18.7
- Languages: English, Spanish
- Countries: United States
Items
Subscales
Attitudes toward Lesbians, 5 Items
Attitudes toward Gay Men, 5 Items
Items by subscale
Attitudes toward Lesbians
- Sex between two women is just plain wrong
- I think female homosexuals (lesbians) are disgusting
- Female homosexuality is a natural expression of sexuality in women
- Female homosexuality is a perversion
- Female homosexuality is merely a different kind of lifestyle that should not be condemned
Attitudes toward Gay Men
- Sex between two men is just plain wrong
- I think male homosexuals are disgusting
- Male homosexuality is a natural expression of sexuality in men
- Male homosexuality is a perversion
- Male homosexuality is merely a different kind of lifestyle that should not be condemned
Responses
All items used a 5 point Likert-type scale, 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Somewhat Disagree, 3 = Neither Disagree nor Agree, 4 = Somewhat Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree
Scoring
“The ATL and ATG are scored by assigning numerical values to the verbal response options, for example, 1 = strongly disagree, and summing across items for each sub-scale. For ease of interpretation, these sums can be divided by the total number of subscale items to yield a score that matches the response scale metric. The possible range of scores depends on the response scale used. Items 1 through 5 comprise the ATG subscale; and Items 6 through 10 comprise the ATL subscale. Items 3, 5, 8, and 10 are reverse scored. The 3-item ATG is composed of Items 1, 2, and 3. The 3-item ATL scale is composed of Items 6, 7, and 8.” (Herek & McLemore, 2020)
Citations
- Herek, G. M., McLemore, K. A. (2020). Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men Scale. In R. R. Milhausen, J. K. Sakaluk, T. D. Fischer, C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures, 4th edition (637-639). Routledge.
- Herek, G. M. (1984). Attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A fac-tor analytic study. Journal of Homosexuality, 10, 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v10n01_03
- Herek, G. M. (1988). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. The Journal of Sex Research, 25, 451–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498809551476
- Herek, G. M. (1994). Assessing heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A review of empirical research with the ATLG scale. In B. Greene & G. M. Herek (Eds.), Lesbian and gay psychology: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 206–228). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Stiekema, E., Warrens, M. J., van Bergen, D. D., & Parlevliet, S. (2024). Assessing attitudes toward LGB people in young adolescents. PloS One, 19(10), e0305057. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305057
Spanish Translation
- Herek, G. M., & Gonzalez-Rivera, M. (2006). Attitudes toward homosexuality among U.S. residents of Mexican descent. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490609552307
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Unknown: Face validity
- Green: Convergent validity
- Green: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Green: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available