Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (Brassard & Bourassa, 2012; adapted from McGahuey et al., 2000)
- Populations: Middle & Late Adolescents
- Age ranges: 14-19
- Languages: French, English
- Countries: Canada
Items
Items assessed the following components of sexual functioning:
- 1. How strong is your sex drive? 1) extremely strong, 2) very strong 3) somewhat strong, 4) very weak 5) no sex drive
- 2. How easily are you sexually aroused (turned on)? 1) extremely easily, 2) very easily, 3) somewhat easily, 4) somewhat difficult, 5) very difficult, 6) never aroused
- 3. Can you easily get and keep an erection? 1) extremely easily, 2) very easily, 3) somewhat easily, 4) somewhat difficult, 5) very difficult, 6) never
- 4. How easily can you reach an orgasm? 1) extremely easily, 2) very easily, 3) somewhat easily, 4) somewhat difficult, 5) very difficult, 6) never
- 5. Are your orgasms satisfying? 1) extremely satisfying, 2) very satisfying, 3) somewhat satisfying, 4) somewhat difficult, 5) very difficult, 6) never reach orgasm
Scoring
Items are summed to provide a total score ranging from 7 to 42, with a higher score indicating more sexual difficulties.
Citations
- Brassard, A., & Bourassa, M. (2012). Traduction française du Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX) [French translation of the Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX)]. Unpublished manuscript.
- Stéphanie Couture, Martine Hébert & Mylène Fernet (2024) Validation of a French-Canadian adaptation of the Hurlbert Index of Sexual Assertiveness for adolescents, Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 39:4, 1106-1123, DOI: 10.1080/14681994.2022.2067981
- McGahuey, C. A., Gelenberg, A. J., Laukes, C. A., Moreno, F. A., Delgado, P. L., McKnight, K. M., & Manber, R. (2000). The Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX): Reliability and validity. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 26(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/009262300278623
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Unknown: Face validity
- Green: Convergent validity
- Unknown: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Unknown: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available