Adverse Childhood Experiences Abuse Short Form (Meinck et al., 2017)

Prevalence of experiences of sexual abuse in adolsecents. 4 Items, age 15 years.
  • Populations: 15 year olds in Romania
  • Age ranges: 15
  • Countries: Romania

Items

Subscales:

  • Emotional Abuse
  • Physical Abuse
  • Sexual Abuse

 

Emotional Abuse Subscale

  • Did a parent, guardian or other household member yell, scream or swear at you, insult or humiliate you?
  • Did a parent, guardian or other household member threaten to, or actually, abandon you or throw you out of the house?

Physical Abuse Subscale

  • Did a parent, guardian or other household member spank, slap, kick, punch, or beat you up?
  • Did a parent, guardian or other household member hit or cut you with an object, such as a stick (or cane), bottle, club, knife, whip, etc?

Sexual Abuse Subscale

  • Did Someone touch or fondle you in a sexual way when you did not want them to?
  • Did someone make you touch their body in a sexual way when you did not want them to?
  • Did someone attempt oral, anal, or vaginal intercourse with you when you did not want them to?
  • Did someone actually have oral, anal, or vaginal intercourse with you when you did not want them to?

 

Response options:

  • I refuse to answer
  • Never
  • Once
  • A few times
  • Many times

Scoring

not reported

Citations

Meinck, F., Cosma, A. P., Mikton, C., & Baban, A. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Adverse Childhood Experiences Abuse Short Form (ACE-ASF) among Romanian high school students. Child Abuse & Neglect, 72, 326–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.08.016

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Unknown: Face validity
  • Green: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading