Adolescent Sexual Communication Scale (Widman et al., 2014)
- Populations: Adolescents
- Age ranges: 12-15
- Languages: English
- Countries: United States
Items
Item Stems and Items:
In the past year, how much have you talked to either of your parents about the following topics?
- Using condoms.
- Using other forms of birth control, like birth control pills.
- Sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).
- HIV/AIDS.
- Getting pregnant/getting someone else pregnant.
- Waiting to have sex until you’re older or sexual abstinence.
In the past year, how much have you talked to your best friend about the following topics?
- Using condoms.
- Using other forms of birth control, like birth control pills.
- Sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).
- HIV/AIDS.
- Getting pregnant/getting someone else pregnant.
- Waiting to have sex until you’re older or sexual abstinence.
In the past year, have you had a boyfriend/girlfriend or someone you liked “more than friends” who you have talked to or hung out with?
- Yes (We will call this person a dating partner for the next question)
- No (Skip to end of survey)
In the past year, how much have you talked to your dating partner about the following topics?
- Using condoms.
- Using other forms of birth control, like birth control pills.
- Sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).
- HIV/AIDS.
- Getting pregnant/getting someone else pregnant.
- Waiting to have sex until you’re older or sexual abstinence.
Responses
Items used a 5 item ordinal response scale: Never talked about this, Talked about this 1 time, Talked about this 2 or 3 times, Talked about this 4 to 6 times, Talked about this 7+ times
Scoring
“Items are coded such that higher responses indicate more frequent communication. Scores can be calculated in two ways depending upon the research question. If an investigator is interested in understanding the average frequency of sexual health communication, they can create a mean score of the 6 items for each communication partner (i.e., parent, friend, dating partner). Alternatively, investigators may create a total score that represents the total number of sexual health topics that youth have discussed with each communication partner. To do this, each item should be dichotomized (0 = never discussed that item or 1 = discussed that item 1 time or more). Then a total sum score can be calculated (possible range = 0 – 6 topics discussed). This was the method we selected in our validation study (Widman et al., 2014) as we wished to compare communication topics between parents, best friends, and dating partners.” (Widman & Stewart, 2020)
Citations
Widman, L., Choukas-Bradley, S., Helms, S. W., Golin, C. E., & Prinstein, M. J. (2014). Sexual communication between early ado-lescents and their dating partners, parents, and best friends. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 731–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.843148
Widman, L., Stewart, J. L. (2020). Adolescent Sexual Communication Scale. In R. R. Milhausen, J. K. Sakaluk, T. D. Fischer, C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures, 4th edition (251-253). Routledge.
Scoring breakdown
Measure development
- Significant design input from young people
- Cognitive interviews with young people
- Expert input
Validity
- Green: Face validity
- Green: Convergent validity
- Unknown: Construct validity
Reliability
- Green: Internal consistency
- Green: Test-retest
Ease of use
- Unknown: Readability
Definitions
Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.
Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.
Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.
Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.
Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).
Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.
Key
- Green: Meets validation criteria
- Red: Does not meet validation criteria
- Unknown: Evidence not available