Adolescent Risk Inventory (Lescano et al., 2006)

Degree and prevalence of risky behaviour related attitudes and risk behaviours in children, adolescents, and young adults; 29 Items / 6 Subscales, Ages 12-19
  • Populations: Adolescents with psychiatric disorders
  • Age ranges: 12-19 years
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: United States

Items

Subscales:

  • HIV anxiety
  • HIV prevention self-efficacy
  • General distress
  • Sex risk
  • Abuse / self harm
  • Acting out

 

Full scale not reported, some example items from the Sex Risk Scale are:

  • How many times have you had sexual intercourse in the past year?
  • How many different sex partners have you had in the past year?
  • Have you ever been pregnant or been a father?

 

“Response options for all of the Attitude items and all but two of the Behavior items are ‘‘yes’’ (rated a 2) and ‘‘no’’ (rated a 1). Response items for questions starting “How many..” are “none” = 1, “one to five” = 2, “six or more” = 3” (Lescano et al., 2006)

Scoring

“Attitude items were asked in reference to attitudes at the time of completion of the measure with the exception of two items that ask about distress in the past month and one item related to intention to use condoms in the next 3 months. Scale scores (for all scales except the Sex Risk Scale), were determined by totaling the number of ‘‘yes’’ responses, with higher scores reflecting greater risk. The Sex Risk Scale score was determined by totaling the responses to the five ‘‘yes/no’’ questions plus the recoded responses to the two ordinal responses detailed above.”  (Lescano et al., 2006)

Citations

Lescano, C. M., Hadley, W. S., Beausoleil, N. I., Brown, L. K., D’eramo, D., & Zimskind, A. (2007). A Brief Screening Measure of Adolescent Risk Behavior. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 37(4), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-006-0037-2

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Green: Face validity
  • Unknown: Convergent validity
  • Green: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Unknown: Internal consistency
  • Unknown: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading