Adolescent Perceived Costs and Benefits Scale for Sexual Intercourse (Small, Silverberg, & Kerns, 1993)

Beliefs about social perceptions of sexual behaviour in adolescents, 20 Items / 10 Item subscales, US school grades 7-12
  • Populations: Adolescents
  • Age ranges: 7th-12th Grade US
  • Languages: English
  • Countries: United States

Items

Subscale

  • Perceived Costs
  • Perceived Benefits

Items by Subscale

Perceived Costs

  • Teenagers don’t have sex because they think it is morally wrong or against their religion.
  • Teenagers don’t have sex because they don’t want to get a sexually transmitted disease (STD) or a disease like AIDS.
  • Teenagers don’t have sex because their parent(s) don’t approve. 
  • Teenagers don’t have sex because they don’t feel old enough to handle it. 
  • Teenagers don’t have sex because their friends won’t approve. 
  • Teenagers don’t have sex because they or their partner might get pregnant.
  • Teenagers don’t have sex because they aren’t in love with anyone yet. 
  • Teenagers don’t have sex because they don’t need it to make them happy. 
  • Teenagers don’t have sex because they would feel guilty. 
  • Teenagers don’t have sex because they or their partner might get pregnant which might mess up their future plans for college, school or a career.

Perceived Benefits

  • Teenagers have sex because it helps them forget their problems. 
  • Teenagers have sex because it makes them feel grown up. 
  • Teenagers have sex because they want to get pregnant or become a parent.
  • Teenagers have sex as a way to get or keep a boyfriend or girlfriend. 
  • Teenagers have sex because it makes them feel good. 
  • Teenagers have sex because it makes them feel loved. 
  • Teenagers have sex because they want to fit in with their friends. 
  • Teenagers have sex because they want to see what it’s like. 
  • Teenagers have sex because it makes them feel more confident and sure of themselves.
  • Teenagers have sex because people they admire or look up to make it seem like a “cool” thing to do.

 

Responses

Items used a 4 point Likert-type scale, 0 = Strongly Disagree, 1 = Disagree, 2 = Agree, 3 = Strongly Agree

Scoring

“For each subscale a total perceived costs or benefits score is obtained by summing the 10 individual items. Scores can range from 0 to 30 with a higher score reflecting higher perceived costs or benefits. Individual items can also be examined to gain insight into the primary or modal reasons particular groups of adolescents perceive for engaging or not engaging in sexual intercourse.” (Small, 2020)

Citations

Scoring breakdown

Measure development

  • Significant design input from young people
  • Cognitive interviews with young people
  • Expert input

Validity

  • Green: Face validity
  • Green: Convergent validity
  • Unknown: Construct validity

Reliability

  • Green: Internal consistency
  • Green: Test-retest

Ease of use

  • Unknown: Readability

Definitions

Face validity: How well a measure appears to represent the construct it is supposed to be measuring.

Convergent validity: How well a measure correlates with other hypothetically-related measures.

Construct validity: The extent to which a measure reflects the construct it was designed to evaluate.

Internal consistency: The extent to which items in a scale capture aspects of the same construct.

Test-retest: The degree to which measurement scores are consistent over a short period of time (usually 2 weeks).

Readability: The ease with which a reader can understand the questionnaire items.

Key

  • Green: Meets validation criteria
  • Red: Does not meet validation criteria
  • Unknown: Evidence not available

Categories

Start a new search

Loading